Which 300mm lens is a good choice for wildlife on a Nikon D60 in Kruger National Park?
Asked 2/22/2012
6 views
2 answers
0
I’m looking for a lens around 300mm for a Nikon D60, mainly for photographing wildlife in Kruger National Park. I’ll likely be shooting from a vehicle, so I’m interested in practical advice on whether a 300mm prime or a zoom would be better, and how important autofocus speed, stabilization, weight, and teleconverter use are for this kind of trip.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
4
Did you try searching? You only have three choices as you can see.
One of them is stabilized (and weather-sealed but that does not count on your camera), the other two are not. Since you are shooting things that move, the stabilization impact will matter most when you shoot the animals at rest. The Nikkor AF-S 300mm F/2.8G ED-IF VR II and the Sigma 300mm F/2.8 let one stop more light in but beware that it they weigh at least one kilo more than the non-stabilized one. Most shots are taken from a Jeep in Kruger park, so it is recommended to bring a beanbag for support to cushion the lens against the window/door frame for stabilization. This means the Sigma 300mm F/2.8 will probably be a great compromise among these.
EDIT In case you do not mind a zoom, there are quite a few more which reach to at least 300mm. Note that some of these are quite slow (F/6.3) at the long end which is not ideal for wildlife.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a Nikon D60, a 300mm lens can work well for wildlife, but the best choice depends on how you’ll shoot.
A strong prime option is the Nikon 300mm f/4: it’s widely regarded as a solid wildlife lens, lighter and more manageable than 300mm f/2.8 lenses, and Nikon autofocus is generally preferred for speed with moving animals. The f/2.8 options give you more light, but they’re much heavier and more expensive.
If you want more flexibility, a zoom such as a 120-300mm can be very useful in a park. Animals may be closer than expected, and zooming out is often easier than trying to change lenses in a dusty vehicle.
Stabilization helps most when subjects are relatively still, and it can still be useful even when shooting from a car. In Kruger, many shots are taken from a vehicle, so a beanbag on the window or door frame is a very practical support.
A 1.4x teleconverter can be helpful when 300mm isn’t enough, but expect some loss of light and slower autofocus, so many wildlife shooters use one only occasionally.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon 70-300mm IS vs 70-200mm f/4L for a beginner safari on a Canon T3i
Should I keep a Sigma 150-600mm for wildlife, or switch to a 300mm prime with a teleconverter?
What photography gear should I bring for White Mountain National Forest and Acadia in August?
Should I use a teleconverter on a Canon 70-300mm, or buy a 150-500mm lens for wildlife?
Best wildlife lens options for a Nikon D5200: 55-300mm, 70-300mm, or a prime with teleconverter?