Where is the line between photo correction and creating a new image in post-processing?

Asked 4/12/2013

4 views

2 answers

0

With modern editing software, a photo can change dramatically after it is captured. I’m wondering how photographers usually think about the boundary between normal correction and actually creating a new image. Is post-processing just part of photography, or does it become something different at some point? For example, are exposure, color, and dust-spot fixes considered correction, while adding or removing scene elements is considered image creation?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

12

It is all image creation.

Please, let me explain. When you take a photo, regardless of the medium used to record it, what you are recording is a virtual image projected by a lens onto a focal plane. The nature, intensity, and direction of the light illuminating your subject, the design of the lens and the focus and aperture settings, the amount of time the shutter is left open: all of these affect the properties of the image you record. Two identical cameras pointed at the same subject can produce incredibly different results by altering one, several, or all of those variables.

The digital age just moved the manipulation of transforming the recorded image to a print from the darkroom to the desktop. It is true that it has also expanded the possibilities of the degree to which an image may be manipulated, but perhaps not as much as some might think. What it has really done is made that manipulation much less time consuming and allowed us to do it much more efficiently. In the film era we could have shot the same scene with dozens of different types of film. Now we can take a single RAW image and retroactively apply the characteristics of each of those films. What would have taken weeks or months to meticulously combine several varying exposures into a single image of a high dynamic range scene we can now do in a matter of minutes.

From the moment we select what to leave in the frame and what to leave out, we are creating something that is different from the reality it represents. Susan Sontag once said, "...to photograph is to frame, and to frame is to exclude."

A photograph is always an expression of the photographer's vision. Sometimes it may closely resemble what others see when they look at what has been photographed. Sometimes it can be totally transformational. On rare occasions it can be both. "Some photographers take reality... and impose the domination of their own thought and spirit. Others come before reality more tenderly and a photograph to them is an instrument of love and revelation." - Ansel Adams

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There isn’t a single hard boundary. In photography, image-making happens both at capture and in post-processing. Choice of light, lens, exposure, focus, and framing already shape the final result, and digital editing is the modern equivalent of darkroom work.

A practical distinction many photographers use is this:

  • Correction/enhancement: adjusting exposure, contrast, color, sharpening, cropping, and removing sensor dust or other recording defects.
  • Creation/manipulation: adding, removing, or substantially altering scene content that was or wasn’t present when the photo was taken.

So basic tonal and technical fixes are usually seen as part of normal photographic workflow, while replacing skies, removing objects, compositing elements, or heavy retouching moves toward creating a new image.

In the end, the exact line is often philosophical or context-dependent. For art photography, almost any degree of manipulation may be acceptable. For journalism, documentary, or some competitions, altering scene content can cross an ethical line even if tonal correction is allowed.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer