When should you use rear-curtain sync instead of front-curtain sync?

Asked 4/1/2013

11 views

2 answers

0

In what situations is rear-curtain (second-curtain) flash sync preferable to front-curtain sync? I'm looking for practical examples of when you would want the flash to fire at the end of the exposure rather than at the beginning.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Use rear-curtain sync when you’re combining flash with a relatively long shutter speed and want motion blur to look natural.

With front-curtain sync, the flash fires at the start of the exposure, freezing the subject first, and any ambient-light motion blur records afterward. That can make light trails appear to extend in front of the subject, which often looks unnatural.

With rear-curtain sync, the flash fires at the end of the exposure. The ambient blur is recorded first, then the subject is frozen at the end position, so the blur trails lead up to the subject. This usually looks more natural for moving subjects.

Typical examples include cars at night, cyclists, dancers, or any scene where you want visible motion trails behind the moving subject rather than in front of it.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

0

Second curtain sync is used when you want to get natural motion where light trails lead to an image as opposed to leading away from it. Normally a flash will go off at the start of a shutter (which is normally longer than the time the flash is active.) This results in a heavily exposed image followed by a trail of light. Second curtain reverses this by making the flash go off at the end so you get a trail of light leading to the more heavily exposed moment of time.

Originally by user11392. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user11392

13y ago

Your Answer