What’s the difference between a rangefinder and an SLR, and what are the advantages of each?
Asked 8/10/2010
4 views
2 answers
0
I’ve seen rangefinder cameras and wondered how they differ from SLRs. How does focusing and viewing work on each type, and are there any advantages a rangefinder offers that an SLR can’t really reproduce?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
18
An SLR camera allows you to look through the lens and was created to reach WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get). It has a mirror box inside, and as a result, is much larger. Other developments include splitting the beam for auto-focus, etc.
A rangefinder is a camera that has a rangefinder mechanism. This is a device that measures subject distance. Through this device, you see two images. When the two images coincide through moving the dial, the correct distance is displayed. On older cameras, this was a separate device and one must transfer this to the lens. Now they are built into the viewfinder. You have different viewfinders for different focal lengths (zoom lenses are difficult, as a result)
Advantages:
- body size/weight
- discreetness
- no mirror blackout, mirror sound, mirror induced vibrations
- shorter registration distance: smaller/lighter lenses, potentially higher quality wide angle lenses
- ease of both-eye-open photography and awareness
Disadvantages:
- lack of autofocus (though some have contrast-detect AF, but it is not phase-detect)
- parallax effect, pronounced at close distances
- no depth-of-field preview, exact framing, and other WYSIWYG things
- switching viewfinders
Originally by user389. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user389
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A rangefinder and an SLR differ mainly in how you view and focus the image.
An SLR lets you look through the taking lens using a mirror and prism, so the viewfinder shows essentially what the lens sees. That means accurate framing, no parallax error, and the ability to judge focus directly through the lens.
A rangefinder uses a separate viewfinder plus a focusing mechanism that measures subject distance. In classic manual rangefinders, you align two images to focus, then the lens is set to that distance. Because you are not viewing through the lens, framing is not exact, especially at close distances, and you generally can’t preview depth of field directly.
Rangefinder advantages:
- smaller and lighter body
- quieter operation
- no mirror blackout or mirror movement
- more discreet shooting
SLR advantages:
- through-the-lens viewing for more accurate composition
- no parallax error
- easier use with interchangeable lenses, especially varying focal lengths
- direct confirmation of focus and framing
So yes: the main things a rangefinder offers that an SLR traditionally does not are a smaller, quieter, mirrorless shooting experience with no mirror blackout.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What are the main types of SLR focusing screens, and can they be swapped?
What’s the difference between vertical and horizontal focal-plane shutters?
What’s the difference between the Polaroid PoGo camera and the Polaroid 300 instant camera?
How are DSLR viewfinder focus-point indicators displayed?
Canon 600D vs 650D autofocus: do all cross-type AF points matter for action?