What’s the difference between a PC sync terminal and a hot shoe for flash?
Asked 10/30/2013
1 views
2 answers
0
I understand that both a PC sync terminal and a hot shoe can trigger a flash, but I’m confused about why a camera might need both. If I can mount a flash directly on the hot shoe, what is the PC terminal for, and when would I use one instead of the other?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
5
The main purpose of PC connections is to fire, via a wired connection, studio flash units not mounted directly to the camera. The only signal a PC connection carries is that the shutter has opened and the flash should fire. It is not capable of carrying any other data. As the capabilities of wireless triggering methods have increased, wired connections of any kind between camera and external flash units not mounted on the camera are waning in popularity. Many newer camera models don't even include a PC connection in the design. If a photographer needs to signal external flash units via PC connection, then an adapter attached to the camera's hot shoe can accomplish this.
The hot shoes of most current cameras, though, are capable of communicating much more data beyond a single triggering signal to a compatible flash. Canon's E-TTL system, Nikon's i-TTL system, as well as the systems of other manufacturers use multiple contacts on the hot shoe to communicate in both directions between the camera and flash unit. This allows things such as automatic flash metering, power adjustment, second curtain sync, and controlling multiple flashes via optical pulses between the hot shoe mounted 'master' flash and several external 'slave' flash units.
If a photographer desires a wired TTL connection off camera, hot shoe cables that include wires for all of the connections between the hot shoe and speedlight are available. Wireless triggers can also attach to a hot shoe. Some wireless units only transmit a single signal, like the old PC connection, that tells the flash to fire. Others allow the full communication between a camera and flash that enable the same functionality as if the flash where mounted directly on the camera's hot shoe.
Which of these connections will work best for you depends on what flash units you have, what camera model you are using, what amount of communication you need between the camera and flash, and how much your budget is.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A hot shoe and a PC sync terminal can both trigger a flash, but they’re used differently.
A hot shoe is mainly for mounting a flash directly on the camera. On many modern cameras it can also carry extra communication, such as TTL/exposure control and other flash data, not just the basic “fire now” signal.
A PC sync terminal is mainly for firing an off-camera flash or studio strobe through a cable. It generally carries only a simple trigger signal when the shutter opens. It does not support TTL, so flashes connected this way are typically used in manual mode (or older auto-thyristor modes).
So if your flash is on the camera, the hot shoe is the natural choice. If your light is off-camera, a PC sync cable is one traditional way to trigger it. Cameras without a PC terminal can use a hot-shoe-to-PC adapter for this purpose.
PC connectors are also older and not especially robust mechanically, so many newer systems use hot-shoe triggers, wireless triggers, or other connector types instead.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I safely use older high-trigger-voltage flashes on a modern camera hot shoe?
Can a radio flash trigger work from a Pentax hot shoe without a sync cable?
Why won’t my Nikon D800E trigger a studio strobe through the PC port or AS-15, but it works through a radio trigger?
Does the Hasselblad X1D have a PC sync socket?
Can vintage flashes with high trigger voltage damage wireless receivers?