What standards exist for storing time and location in digital photos, and can they be authenticated?
Asked 4/23/2015
6 views
2 answers
0
I’m building a project that gathers photos in near real time from many contributors over a large area. The images may be submitted semi-anonymously, but we need at least the capture time and ideally the location recorded with each image.
I’d like to know:
- what standard metadata formats are used to store timestamp and GPS/location data in image files
- whether most cameras commonly write this information
- which standard is most widely used
- whether any of these systems can actually authenticate that the reported time and place are genuine, rather than just store the data
We may process many images automatically, so standards that are commonly supported by cameras and software are especially relevant.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
3
For embedding standard metadata in images, EXIF is considered the primary standard, which provides well understood fields for time and location information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format
In addition, EXIF has a tag known as 'maker data' that allows 3rd parties to embed custom tags. This is typically where a Canon or Nikon embeds camera specific metadata, and they do not usually share the contents of their custom metadata. However, you could certainly use this area for your own needs as well, though it isn't 'standard'.
Finally, IPTC (International Press Telecommunications Council) publishes their own standard, which has more extensive metadata. This is often supported by editing and photo management software, rather than cameras.
https://iptc.org/standards/photo-metadata/
IPTC provides more fields related to location, scene subject, etc that might prove useful to you as well.
Originally by user4880. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4880
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main standard for this is EXIF. It commonly stores capture time, and it also has defined GPS fields for location when a camera or connected device provides that data. EXIF is the most widely used metadata standard written by cameras.
IPTC is another important metadata standard, but it is more often added or edited by software than by the camera itself. Some workflows also follow Metadata Working Group (MWG) guidelines to improve consistency between EXIF/IPTC fields.
However, these standards store metadata; they do not reliably authenticate it. Timestamps and GPS data in EXIF can be missing, wrong, or edited later. Camera-specific maker notes can contain extra proprietary metadata, but they are not a universal authentication method.
So for your project, requesting EXIF date/time and GPS metadata is sensible and widely supported, but you should not treat it as proof of authenticity by itself. If authenticity matters, metadata should be only one signal, combined with other validation methods in your ingestion workflow.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How should we specify minimum image quality for a print-focused photo archive?
Why do most cameras use sequential filenames instead of date/time names?
Can you determine a photo’s original capture time with the correct time zone from metadata?
What software can write consistent EXIF, IPTC, and XMP metadata including face tags?
Do cameras record compass direction or orientation in photo metadata, and can they track position better than GPS?