What monitor should a Windows-based photographer buy for vivid, color-accurate image editing?

Asked 1/3/2011

3 views

2 answers

0

I like the look of the large iMac display, but I use Windows and don’t want to switch platforms. I’m building a desktop workstation for photography and want a large monitor that makes images look vivid while also being suitable for photo editing.

What types of displays should photographers look for on Windows? Are there monitor technologies or brands/models known for strong color accuracy, wide gamut coverage, and good calibration support?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

12

I guess there isn't much more I could say other than I own the Apple CinemaDisplay 30" LCD screen, and I am a heavy duty Microsoft/.NET developer. I work entirely in Windows 7 on my custom-build PC (not a Mac), and this screen has been great. I purchased it quite a number of years ago, and it is still running strong.

If I was in the market more recently, I would definitely go for an LED LCD screen, rather than a CCFL LCD screen. LED screens, particularly those with a clear/glossy screen, offer a much wider gamut, more accurate color rendition, and broader coverage of the AdobeRGB and NTSC gamuts than other screens. There are several manufacturers who make LED computer screens these days, including Eizo with their ColorEdge screens, LaCie with their new 730 model (one of the best photo editing screens on the market with the broadest gamut I've ever seen...my next screen if the Apple ever dies), as well as more well-known brands such as NEC (I'm having a hard time finding professional grade LED monitors from NEC right now), Apple, etc.

If you want a high quality, wide gamut screen that is designed for a photo editing workflow, I highly recommend looking into LED screens, particularly professional grade ones. NEC and Apple will have them at more reasonable prices, but with narrower gamuts than true professional grade LED screens. If you want the top of the line, with the widest gamut currently available, look no further than the LaCie 730. It covers 123% of the AdobeRGB color gamut, which is ideal for photographic editing. It is not quite as physically appealing as the Apple CinemaDisplay, but color-rendition-wise, it is fantastic.

Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user124

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—Windows photographers are not limited to iMacs. The key is to focus on monitor technology, not brand alone.

For photo work, an IPS panel is the safest choice. Compared with common TN panels, IPS displays have much better viewing angles, less color shifting, and are generally easier to calibrate accurately. VA sits in the middle, but IPS is usually preferred for photography.

Also look for a display with wide color gamut coverage and hardware/software calibration support. LED-backlit LCDs are generally preferable to older CCFL models. A glossy screen may look more vivid, but for editing, color accuracy and calibration matter more than “pop.”

Brands mentioned favorably include NEC’s color-accurate lines (such as the 90 series and P/PA series), Eizo ColorEdge, and LaCie photo-oriented displays. An Apple display can also be used with a Windows PC, so you’re not restricted if you like that look.

In short: choose a large IPS monitor with strong sRGB/Adobe RGB coverage and calibration support rather than chasing the most saturated showroom appearance.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer