What makes a lens a macro lens, and what are the alternatives for close-up photography?
Asked 7/3/2013
8 views
2 answers
0
I'm new to still photography and recently bought a Sony Alpha A58. I want to take high-quality close-up photos and I'm trying to understand macro lenses.
How are macro lenses specified? Is it mainly by focal length, or by something else such as magnification?
Also, if I don't buy a dedicated macro lens right away, what other options are there for getting close-up shots with a regular lens?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
7
A macro lens is simply a lens that allows closer-than-normal focus. Most fixed-focal-length macro lenses will focus to a 1:1 reproduction ratio — that is, the size of the object's image on the sensor at the closest focusing distance will be the same as the size of the object itself. Some specialized lenses (notably the Canon MP-E 65 f/2.8 and the old Minolta 1-3X macro zoom) will only focus at high-magnification distances (the MP-E 65, for instance, will only produce images between life-size and 5x life-size). Zoom lenses marked "macro" may permit images that are only half life-size or 1/4 life-size.
Taking 1:1 lenses as the norm, they will all give you the same magnification. The focal length determines how far away from the subject the camera can be at a given magnification. Longer lenses can be used from farther away. In most cases, at least with live subjects, longer is better. And being further away means that your camera won't be blocking the light that made the subject interesting in the first place.
It is not necessarily true that you need a special macro lens for close-up shots. It really depends on how close-up you need to be. Most of the kit zoom lenses will get in tight enough for florals and such; it's only when you want a very small subject to take up a substantial proportion of the picture that you'd need to go to a special lens. Even there, though, you often have alternatives like extension tubes (spacers that move the lens further from the sensor), close-focus filters ("diopters"), and reverse-mounting or stacking lenses. The problem is that, unlike most macro lenses, you can't focus far away with the same set-up you use for close-focusing — you lose the ability to achieve infinity focus, and may not be able to focus more than a few inches away, depending on how radical your set-up is.
Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2719
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A true macro lens is defined mainly by its maximum magnification, not just focal length. A common standard is 1:1 reproduction, meaning the subject is projected onto the sensor at life size at the lens’s closest focus distance. Some lenses labeled “macro,” especially zooms, may only reach 1:2 or 1:4 magnification.
Focal length still matters: at the same magnification, a longer macro lens lets you stay farther from the subject, which is useful for lighting and for subjects you don’t want to disturb. Shorter macro lenses require you to get closer.
You can also do close-up photography without a dedicated macro lens. Common options include:
- extension tubes, which let a regular lens focus closer
- close-up filters/diopters, which screw onto the front of a lens
- reversing a lens with an adapter for high magnification
These alternatives can work well, though dedicated macro lenses are usually the most convenient and optically refined solution.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What is a macro lens, and what does 1:1 magnification mean?
Are extension tubes a worthwhile budget alternative to a macro lens?
At the same magnification, is macro depth of field the same with a macro lens, extension tubes, diopters, or a reversed lens?
Why can two lenses with similar minimum focus distance have very different magnification?
What physically distinguishes a macro lens from a regular lens?