What focus-chart results suggest a lens element is de-centered or out of spacing?

Asked 11/26/2014

2 views

2 answers

0

An older 135mm f/2.8 lens is reasonably sharp stopped down, but becomes increasingly soft as the aperture opens. Around f/11 to f/5.6 the center stays fairly sharp while the edges develop a smeared, doubled look; by f/4 the softness reaches the center, and at f/2.8 the whole image looks very dreamy. In the test chart, edge details appear doubled.

There is no obvious visible damage when looking through the lens, and only a very slight rattle when shaken. A second copy of the same lens performs normally, so this copy appears faulty.

Do these symptoms point to a particular optical problem, such as a loose, de-centered, or incorrectly spaced element?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

3

From an optical testing standpoint the main aberration that shows up on axis is spherical - and it varies only due to (F/#)^4, which explains why you are getting a soft focus at a larger aperture. If you look at the top and bottom the the image you see triangles aren't imaged the same, which would probably be astigmatism. I could tell you more if I saw more pictures, but that doesn't really matter; I think one of your lens elements is de-spaced and/or de-centered. I don't know how easy it is to fix it though; I have never aligned a lens myself, though I have seen instructions on the internet on how to do it. If you have another copy I see no reason not to mess around with it.

Originally by user35709. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user35709

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes — these results are consistent with an internal alignment problem, most likely a lens element that is de-centered and/or out of proper spacing.

The pattern fits common aberration behavior:

  • Softness increasing rapidly at wider apertures points to spherical aberration becoming more visible.
  • Different rendering toward the edges, including doubled detail, suggests off-axis aberrations such as astigmatism.

Together, that strongly suggests something in the optical group is not sitting where it should be, rather than the lens simply being an old or inherently soft design. The slight rattle could support the idea of a loose internal part, but the test images are more meaningful evidence than the rattle alone.

Because another copy of the same lens performs properly, this copy is almost certainly defective rather than just characterful. Repair may require optical realignment, which is often fiddly and not always economical. If it has little resale value as a normal lens, it makes sense either to sell it honestly as defective/soft-focus-character, keep it for creative use, or experiment with disassembly if you're comfortable risking it.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer