Is edge softness at the long end normal on an older wide-angle zoom lens?
Asked 4/21/2019
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m using a Tamron AF 20-40mm f/2.7-3.5 SP on a Sony a7 via a manual adapter. At 20mm the lens looks reasonably sharp across the frame, but at 40mm only the center seems sharp and the outer areas become very soft, especially on one side. These were handheld test shots of a fence about 25 ft away, manually focused just short of infinity, shot in RAW and exported without lens-profile corrections. At 40mm the softness is obvious at f/10, and it improves somewhat by f/32. Is this kind of long-end softness normal for a wide-angle zoom of this era, or does it suggest a bad copy or another problem?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
2
This is fairly typical for wide angle zoom lenses, even those that are a lot more expensive than the Tamron AF 20-40mm F2.7-3.5 SP Aspherical IF. Roger Cicala, the founder and chief lens guru at lensrentals.com, did a blog entry regarding this very thing a while back.
Painting Zoom Lenses with a Broad Brush – Roger’s Law of Wide Zoom Relativity
After testing ten copies of each of nine different wide angle lenses in the 15-16-17 mm to 24-28-30-35-40 mm range, he concluded:
At this point, I think, the pattern is pretty clear. For simplicity sake, I think it best we give this pattern a name, and I think the logical name would be “Roger’s Law of Wide Zoom Relativity” since wide zooms are relatively sharper at the wide end. Are there exceptions to this law? Yes, but they are few and far between. For a few of these sets of 9 copies, there’s one lens that’s better at the long end than at the wide end, but for most there are none. No set tested averaged better at the long end than at the wide end.
He then went on to similarly test 10 copies of 8 different standard range zooms (typically 24-70mm or 28-70mm), and said:
Again, you can see the pattern; standard range zooms tend to resolve better at the wider end, not as well at the telephoto end. I didn’t show them, but 24-105mm and 24-120mm zooms have the same pattern. So the Law of Wide Zoom Relativity seems to hold true for zooms that go from wide to slightly telephoto. I can’t tell you if it’s true for superzooms, like 18-270s, because I will never, ever test them. Life is too short to test 10x zooms. I can tell you that it’s not true for 70-200 zooms, but that’s the subject of a future post.
In your specific case, you probably have a copy that varies even more than the average. It's not that unexpected with a lens such as the Tamron AF 20-40mm F2.7-3.5 SP Aspherical IF. Roger has stated elsewhere that many of Tamron's lower cost lenses, as well as those of other lens makers, don't have internal adjustments to correct for differences in manufacturing tolerances like higher end lenses do. With such lenses, what you get is what you get. That's probably why it was sold on eBay shortly after the original owner bought it.
A lot of folks will test new lenses after they purchase them. If the lens performs as well as or better than what most reviews indicate, they'll keep it. If it does worse, they'll sell it and try another copy until they find one they want to keep. There are even a few buyers that will purchase multiple copies of lenses at the same time and test each one. They'll keep the best of the bunch and resell the rest.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Some loss of sharpness at the long end is normal for many wide-angle zooms, including older designs. A commonly observed pattern is that wide zooms are relatively sharper at their wide end and weaker toward the long end, so seeing the 20mm image outperform the 40mm image is not surprising by itself.
That said, your sample sounds worse than just normal edge falloff if one side is notably softer than the other. General long-end softness can be expected; strong asymmetry can point to sample variation or an issue such as decentering/alignment.
Also, your test setup leaves a few variables: handheld shooting, manual focus, and focusing near infinity on a subject only about 25 ft away. Those can all affect results. Stopping down more will usually improve edge sharpness, which matches what you saw at f/32, though that aperture can introduce diffraction and isn’t ideal as a sharpness benchmark.
So the short answer: yes, softer performance at 40mm is typical for wide zooms, but if the right side is much worse than the left, your copy may have an optical alignment problem. A tripod-based, carefully focused comparison would help confirm it.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why does a variable ND filter cause an X-pattern and uneven darkening on a wide-angle lens?
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L has a loose zoom ring and doesn’t reach 17mm — what should I do?
Is a Canon 5D Mark II with EF 17-40mm f/4L a good setup for interior real estate photography?
Why do photos from a Panasonic LX5 look softer or noisier at full optical zoom?
Why is my 70-300mm zoom softer at 300mm, and how can I improve sharpness?