What flash power do I need for small still-life photography at around f/5.6?

Asked 3/16/2016

5 views

2 answers

0

I’m replacing two continuous fluorescent lights in a small white room (about 4m × 3m) with flash for still-life work. My current setup uses two softboxes aimed away from the subject so the light bounces around the room and gives soft, even illumination. With the continuous lights, I’m typically shooting around 1/8 sec, f/5.6, ISO 200.

I’d like to use two flashes or strobes in softboxes and continue working around f/5.6. For a small still-life setup in a controlled room with ambient light mostly blocked, how much flash power do I actually need? Is a pair of speedlights likely to be enough, or should I be looking at studio strobes? Also, how should I think about guide number vs watt-second ratings when comparing options, and is limited power adjustment range something to worry about?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

4

General wisdom is that you use studio strobes if you need more power/light. You use speedlights if you want portability and your lighting needs are modest.

Most of us start with speedlights because of the Strobist website. It's where a lot of us learned to light. And the reason speedlights are central to this style of lighting is because most folks already had one, and they're very small, portable (battery-powered), and cheap. And unlike a studio strobe, you can use one both on and off the camera. So that same light you're setting up for a studio product shoot can also be used on the camera for a run'n'gun event or social shoot, and are easier to take on location.

In addition, if you're shooting small still lives, with relatively small subjects, then you can actually work in much closer, and you'll need less light. So, speedlights are probably going to be more than sufficient for what you want to do in your other post. The question is what else are you going to need the flashes for?

It's when you need to shoot, say, a family of five, outdoors in bright sunlight, that a speedlight might not cut it, power-wise.

OTOH, getting two $70 manual speedlight and finding out they're not powerful enough at the highest setting is not nearly as much of a mistake as getting two $300 studio strobes and finding out they're too powerful on the lowest setting. :)

Originally by user27440. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user27440

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For a small, controlled still-life setup, a pair of speedlights is likely enough. Community experience suggests that if ambient light is already under control and your subjects are small, entry-level speedlights should provide sufficient power for around f/5.6, especially when used fairly close to the setup.

A key point: softness comes more from the apparent size of the light source relative to the subject than from bouncing it farther away. A softbox placed closer is usually softer than one placed farther away.

Power range usually isn’t a big problem with speedlights because many can be adjusted from full power down to 1/128, giving lots of flexibility. Some lower-cost studio strobes may have a narrower adjustment range, though you can always reduce output further with diffusion or neutral-density material.

Guide number and watt-seconds are not directly comparable in a simple way, because beam spread, reflector design, modifiers, and distance all affect real output. In practice, choose based on use case: speedlights for modest power, flexibility, and portability; studio strobes when you know you need significantly more power.

If your setup remains similar, speedlights are a sensible place to start.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer