What deep-sky objects can I photograph with a 70-300mm lens instead of a telescope?
Asked 1/25/2015
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m thinking about trying budget deep-sky astrophotography with a 70-300mm lens, possibly with a 1.4x teleconverter, rather than buying a telescope right away. I’ve seen examples of the Orion Nebula photographed without a telescope.
What kinds of nebulae, clusters, or other deep-sky objects are realistic targets with this sort of setup? I’m mainly trying to understand whether a telephoto lens can capture enough worthwhile objects to justify the effort. I don’t have filters yet, and I understand dark skies and longer tracked exposures may be important.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
4
Assuming you're in the northern hemisphere and can escape the worst of the light pollution, you should be able to capture a pretty fair percentage of the Messier objects in pictures, even if the lens is a little dim to see them in the viewfinder. You should be able to rely on guide stars to get their rough location, though, and half the fun will be bracketing for location once you get them in-frame.
Keep in mind that these objects were discovered and catalogued using 18th-century telescopes, which really can't hold a candle to modern optics (even "eeew, plastic" consumer-grade lenses), and that your camera can see in the dark better than you can. Since Messier hunting is sort of the next step up in the entry-level hobby astronomer progression after the Galillean planets, you'll likely find a lot of information to help you in the hunt available online. And it does require some hunting for the amateur astronomer; most of them can't be observed in a hobbyist-class Dobsonian telescope unless you look at them outside of your centre of vision, and auto-finders are not usually part of a Dobsonian setup.
Originally by user35658. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user35658
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes — a telephoto lens in the 70-300mm range can photograph quite a few bright deep-sky objects, especially under dark skies. Based on the answers, realistic targets include bright Messier objects and star clusters such as the Pleiades, and the Orion Nebula is also a common example.
The main limits are not just focal length, but tracking and sky quality. On a fixed tripod, exposures longer than roughly 30 seconds will start to show star trails, so a clock-drive/tracking mount helps a lot. Because deep-sky subjects are faint, you may also need to stack multiple exposures to improve signal and reduce noise.
Light pollution is a major factor: getting away from city and highway lighting will make a big difference.
So, yes, this setup can be worth trying for brighter deep-sky objects, but expect the best results on larger/brighter targets rather than very small or faint nebulae. Locating objects may also require using guide stars and some trial-and-error framing.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What camera setup is best for deep-sky astrophotography with a Skywatcher 127 telescope?
How can I avoid star trailing when imaging deep-sky objects without a tracking mount?
How can I get a wider field of view for astrophotography through a 1200mm reflector?
Can long exposures overheat or damage a DSLR sensor for astrophotography?
What’s the better budget setup for deep-sky astrophotography: telescope on a tracking mount or telephoto lens on an AstroTrac?