What circle of confusion should I use if my full-frame photos will only be viewed on a smartphone?
Asked 11/12/2021
7 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to choose an acceptable circle of confusion for depth-of-field calculations when images from a full-frame DSLR will only be viewed on a smartphone screen.
Using the usual idea that acceptable CoC depends on viewing distance and display size relative to the camera format, I compared this with the classic full-frame assumption of about 0.03–0.034 mm for an 8×10 inch print viewed at roughly 10 inches.
If a phone is viewed at about 269 mm and the displayed image diagonal is about 126 mm (cropped to 3:2), then scaling from the standard print case gives a much less demanding CoC requirement—around 0.087 mm for full frame.
Is that reasoning basically correct, or am I misapplying CoC to screen viewing?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
2
The physics that encompasses circle of confusion size is based on the resolving power of the human eye. As you know, objects appear smaller with distance. If a friend holds a coin 1 inch in diameter and walks away, the apparent size of the coin shrinks. At a distance of 3000 diameters away, the coin now appears only as a point of reflected light, not as a disk. Additionally, a wagon wheel 3 feet in diameter becomes a point at 9000 feet (1 ¾ miles). The 3000 X diameter rule-of-thumb is based on human eyes with 20/20 vision in bright sun. Change any of these parameters and the rules change . Because of the contrast of photos and their typical viewing conditions, the industry uses 1000 X the diameter. That works out to 3.4 minutes of arc, equivalent to 1/100 of an inch viewed from 10 inches (0.25mm or 1/50 of an inch viewed from 20 inches (0.5mm viewed from 500mm).
The diagonal measure comes into play, we tend to view photographs from a distance about equal to their diagonal measure. Consider a print 8x10 inch made from 35mm full frame. We must enlarge the 35mm image 8x to obtain this enlargement. The diagonal measure of an 8x10 is 13 inches. We tend to view this size print from about 13 inches. Given these considerations, depth-of-field tables are likely based on a circle size of ½ millimeter. To accomplish, in the camera, the maximum permissible circle size becomes 0.5mm ÷ 8 = 0.1mm.
The answer to your question is – the subpixels (red – green – blue) glowing dots on the phone should be no larger than 0.5mm, however, smaller is better. Viewed from 10 inches they need to be 1/000 of an inch = 0.25mm.
Let me add – a neat way the industry uses for depth-of-field tables is to express the circle of confusion size as a fraction of the focal length. This method roughly takes into account how much magnification will likely be applied to produce the viewed image. Often the circle size chosen is 1/1000 of the focal length. For critical work Leica uses 1/1500 of the focal length and Kodak used 1/1750 from very critical work.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—if you’re using CoC as an acceptability criterion for final viewing, your result is reasonable.
CoC is defined at capture, but the commonly used “acceptable” CoC value is based on how large the image will be displayed and how far away it will be viewed, which ultimately comes from human visual acuity. A smaller display viewed at about the same distance requires less enlargement than an 8×10 print, so the capture-side CoC can be larger.
Compared with the classic full-frame assumption (~0.03–0.034 mm for an 8×10 viewed at ~10 in), a phone image with roughly one-third the display size and similar viewing distance would allow about a 3× larger acceptable CoC. That puts full-frame CoC around 0.09 mm, so your 0.087 mm estimate is in line with that reasoning.
Just note that this is a rule-of-thumb based on typical eyesight and viewing conditions. If someone zooms in, views closer, or has sharper vision, the effective acceptable CoC becomes smaller.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How is the acceptable circle of confusion chosen for depth-of-field calculations?
Why would you use a 0.007mm circle of confusion on a Canon 5D Mark II?
Is the traditional hyperfocal distance calculation outdated for high-resolution digital cameras?
For digital cameras, is circle of confusion based on one pixel, two pixels, or something else?
Does circle of confusion depend on megapixels or sensor size?