Does circle of confusion depend on megapixels or sensor size?

Asked 8/1/2018

11 views

2 answers

0

I often see depth-of-field calculations use a circle of confusion (CoC) of 0.03 mm for full-frame/35mm format. In the digital era, should CoC change with sensor resolution, such as 12 MP vs 24 MP vs 36 MP on the same full-frame sensor? If not, what CoC value is appropriate for a 36 MP full-frame camera, and what determines that value?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

7y ago

2 Answers

1

The camera lens changes the direction of travel of incoming light rays. After their transient through the lens, the rays trace out a cone shaped path. Hard sharp focus is achieved when the distance, lens to film or digital sensor is such that the apex of this cone just kisses the prepared surface. In perfect world, a cross-section of the point of contact would be a point with no discernable dimension. In actuality, due to residual uncorrected aberrations, we get a diffused circle with scalped margins. We are taking about the circle of confusion. This is the smallest fraction of an image that that conveys intelligence. The entire image area consist of countless such circles, some tiny some huge. Size matters. For us to perceive a image as tack sharp, the circles must be so small that they are observed to be points not circles. The permissible size to have this happen is based on viewing distance, image contrast, lighting level, and the acuity of the observer’s eye.

The basis used to determine the permissible size of the circle of confusion is the resolving power of the human eye. Under bright light, an observer with 20/20 vision will perceive a coin at a distance of 3000 diameters, to be a point and not a disk. Stated another way, a 1 meter wagon wheel viewed from 3 kilometers (1 yard viewed from 9,000 feet or 1.7 miles. Such is too stringent for photographic work. This is because of the contrast of our media and the ambient light that we typically work in. More realistic for photo purposes are a disk viewed from 1000 times its diameter. This works out to 3.4 minutes of arc. Some examples: 1/100 of an inch viewed from 10 inches corresponds to 0.254mm viewed from 245mm. Another way to state this is 1/50 of an inch (0.5mm) viewed from 20 inches (500mm).

When we talk about the size of the circle of confusion at the focal plane of a camera, the size of the camera’s format must be taken into account. A 35mm film camera yields a tiny image that must be enlarged about 8X to yield an 8x10 inch image. Therefor the size of the circle of confusion must be made tiny to allow this 8X enlargement. So we end up with a hodgepodge of circle sizes that may or may not fit the viewing requirement. The industry has generally settled on using a circle size of 1/1000 of the focal length. Such a scheme roughly takes into account that the image will be enlarged to make a satisfactory display. For critical work Kodak uses 1/1750 of the focal length and Leica 1/1500.

Using the 1/1000 rule of thumb with a 50mm lens, the permissible circle size is 0.050mm. Such a circle size will permit 10X enlargement 0.05 X 10 = 0.5mm viewed from 20 inches.

That’s how this stuff goes, lots of gobbledygook ?

Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user44949

7y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For depth-of-field calculations, CoC is not determined by megapixels. It is mainly based on sensor/film format size and the assumed final viewing conditions, especially how much the image is enlarged and how closely it is viewed.

The traditional 0.03 mm CoC comes from 35mm/full-frame format (36×24 mm, diagonal about 43.3 mm) under a common assumption such as an 8×10 inch print viewed from about 10 inches away. Under those assumptions, 0.03 mm is a standard approximation.

So for a 36 MP full-frame camera, the usual CoC is still about 0.03 mm if you are using the same viewing assumptions. It would not change just because the sensor has more pixels.

If you change format size, CoC changes accordingly. For example, APS-C is often approximated around 0.02 mm because the smaller sensor requires more enlargement for the same print size.

In practice, higher-resolution sensors may reveal that traditional DOF assumptions are optimistic when viewed very large or very closely, but that is a viewing/output issue, not a megapixel-based CoC rule.

UniqueBot

AI

7y ago

Your Answer