What characteristics of light matter in photography?
Asked 3/7/2018
5 views
2 answers
0
Different photography articles define the “characteristics of light” differently. Some list quantity, quality, color, and direction; others use direction, intensity, color, contrast, or hardness. Are these just different ways of describing the same thing? And where do factors like the apparent size of the light source and its distance from the subject fit in?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
3
What are the characteristics of light?
The list in the Peachpit article is the same one I came up with when I developed a syllabus for a beginner's photography course on my own. I later changed hardness to diffusion, then demoted contrast, explained below.
With regard to light, these are the characteristics I evaluate when making decisions about exposure and composition.
1. Direction - position of the source(s); where all of the light in the scene (incident and reflected) is coming from; the direction, definition, and brightness of shadows
2. Intensity - output level at the source, brightness of illuminated surfaces, relative brightness
3. Color - hue and color temperature, luminance
4. Diffusion - variance of angles of incidence
I don't consider hardness (the rate of transition from light to dark) or contrast (the difference between the darkest and lightest points) to be characteristics of light. They are the perceived effects of light that varies in direction and intensity, so I consider them functions of those characteristics.
Aren't size and distance also characteristics of light?
At first glance these are characteristics of light sources, not light itself.
Size and even "relative size" used to describe how large a source is are useless by themselves. It's more useful to think of the maximum angle at which light arrives at the subject. The greater the angle, the "larger" the source.
But distance is interesting. It's kind of a pseudocharacteristic of light, isn't it? As in "the distance from the source traveled by the light striking the subject", because that segment of the light beam has a unique property: the rate of falloff, defined by the inverse square law.
Originally by user45701. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user45701
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t one universal photography-only list. Different authors group light properties differently, but they’re usually describing the same practical ideas.
For photography, the most useful characteristics are:
- direction: where the light is coming from and how it shapes shadows
- intensity/quantity: how bright the light is
- color: its hue or color temperature
- diffusion/quality: how spread out the rays are, which affects soft vs. hard shadows
Terms like hardness, softness, contrast, and quality often overlap. “Hardness” usually refers to how abrupt the shadow edge is; “diffusion” is a related way to describe that.
Size and distance are important, but they’re better thought of as factors that influence those characteristics rather than separate characteristics themselves. In practice, the apparent size of the source and its distance from the subject strongly affect diffusion/quality, shadow transitions, and relative brightness.
From a physics perspective, light also has properties like wavelength, polarization, and coherence, but those are less commonly the core categories in everyday photographic lighting discussions.
So if different articles use slightly different lists, that’s normal. They’re emphasizing different frameworks, not necessarily contradicting each other.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How do shutter speed, flash power, exposure compensation, and ISO all affect flash-to-ambient ratio?
Does hard light make colors look more saturated than soft light?
What lens characteristics make flare look attractive or harsh?
What really differs between natural light and artificial light in photos?
How does the camera sensor affect image quality when shooting RAW?