What camera should I buy for shooting a first short film on about a $500–$600 budget?
Asked 10/6/2010
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m buying my first camera mainly to shoot a short film, and I don’t have much experience with cameras yet. My rough budget is about $500–$600, though I could stretch a bit if it’s clearly worthwhile.
Features I’m hoping for:
- ability to shoot both wide-angle and telephoto shots
- some slow-motion capability if possible
- removable storage with decent capacity
- reasonable battery life
- external microphone input
- at least 720p HD, ideally full HD
- easy export to common video formats
I realize some of this may require interchangeable lenses or trade-offs. Are there any good camera options in or near this budget, and which features are realistic at this price?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
3
At the risk of being controversial, I'd suggest a good quality stills camera, that offers HD video capability; something like the Canon T2i (in the US) which appears to be a bit above your budget at around 750 USD. With the larger sensor in a DSLR, you'll be able to get more of a cinematic effect with wide apertures, and the associated shallow depth of field. Don't forget that there have been a number of high profile shows filmed along similar principles.
Originally by user21. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user21
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
In this budget, you’ll likely need to accept some trade-offs. For a more cinematic look, a DSLR or mirrorless stills camera with HD video is a sensible direction because the larger sensor can give you shallow depth of field and interchangeable lenses for wide and telephoto shots.
From the answers, the Canon T2i is a strong suggestion if you can stretch above budget. It offers HD video and an external mic input, which is still uncommon on cheaper models. The Nikon D3100 was also mentioned as a possible fit, though also slightly above budget.
If slow motion is a top priority, Casio models were specifically noted as stronger for high-frame-rate capture, but they are not DSLRs and may not meet your other filmmaking needs as well.
A lower-cost alternative mentioned is the Olympus PEN E-PL1, which can do HD video, interchangeable lenses, SDHC storage, and external mic support via adapter, but its battery life and slow-motion capability are weaker.
So the practical advice is: prioritize your must-haves. If external mic input and a cinematic look matter most, look at a used or discounted DSLR/mirrorless option like a T2i-class camera. If slow motion matters most, consider Casio-style high-speed cameras.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What should I look for in an easy-to-use camera for low-light family photos on a $500 budget?
Can I use alkaline AA batteries in a DSLR speedlight, or should I use rechargeables?
Why is my Nikon D3200 battery only lasting 70–100 shots per charge?
What’s the best budget way to start black-and-white photography: digital RAW conversion or black-and-white film?
What camera meets my intro digital photography class requirements?