Can I use alkaline AA batteries in a DSLR speedlight, or should I use rechargeables?

Asked 1/9/2011

1 views

2 answers

0

I’m buying my first external flash for a Nikon DSLR, likely an SB-600 or SB-700, and I’m deciding what AA batteries to use. I shoot infrequently, so I wondered if standard alkaline batteries would be fine at first since I already have some on hand.

For a long event, I might take 500–1,000 photos, with perhaps 250–500 using flash. Would one set of alkaline batteries realistically last, and how do alkalines compare with NiMH rechargeables or disposable lithium AAs for recycle time and total flashes?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

14

Short answer: while a flash will work okay with alkaline batteries, other types are better.

Nikon produces excellent manuals for their flashes, with a lot of great technical information (rivaled in this area only by Metz). The following is from the SB-600 User Manual, page 19:

Alkaline-manganese | 3.5 sec. | 200  / 6-30 sec.
Lithium            | 4.0 sec. | 400  / 7.5-30 sec.
Nickel             | 2.5 sec. | 180  / 6-30 sec.
NiCd (1000 mAh)    | 2.9 sec. |  90  / 4-30 sec.
Ni-MH (2000 mA)    | 2.5 sec. | 220  / 4-30 sec.

The first column is the type, followed by approximate time between full-power flashes (best case), followed by the number of flashes you can expect to get, followed by the typical recharge time.

Additionally, on a further chart, Nikon recommends recharging your NiCds or NiMHs when the recycling time drops to 10 seconds, whereas it's suggested to keep your alkalines until they're taking a full half a minute between flashes. (It's worth noting that they give the 10-seconds-then-trash recommendation for Lithium primary cells too.)

So, you can see that while Lithiums last longer, it's not so much more than NiMH that it's really going to be worth it except in extraordinary circumstances (like, no access to power for weeks).

The most important differentiator here, though, is the recycle time. It takes 50% more time to be ready to go again when using alkaline batteries. That alone is a reason to go with NiMH.

Also, if you're not going through batteries constantly, I highly recommend low-self-discharge NiMH batteries like Sanyo's Eneloops — normally, NiMH batteries drain significantly just sitting overnight, and these don't, so you can charge them up and have them ready to go.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes, a speedlight will work with standard alkaline AAs, but they’re usually not the best choice for flash use.

From Nikon’s SB-600 data, alkalines give about 200 flashes with roughly 3.5 sec recycle time at best, while NiMH rechargeables are about 220 flashes with faster recycle times around 2.5 sec. Disposable lithium AAs can last longer—around 400 flashes in Nikon’s figures—but with somewhat slower listed recycle time than NiMH.

In practice, flashes draw high current, which alkalines handle poorly. They tend to slow down as they drain, so recycle times can become frustrating. For an event with 250–500 flash pops, one set of alkalines is unlikely to be enough, especially if many shots use moderate to high flash power.

If you shoot only occasionally, disposable lithium AAs are a better non-rechargeable option than alkalines: longer life, lighter weight, and good performance under flash load. If you expect to use flash regularly, NiMH rechargeables are generally the best balance of speed, consistency, and cost over time.

Whatever you choose, carry at least one spare set.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer