What are the practical pros and cons of linear vs circular polarizing filters?
Asked 4/24/2016
3 views
2 answers
0
I understand the basic difference between linear and circular polarizers, but I want to compare their real-world pros and cons for photography. In particular:
- Do they differ in photographic effect, such as reducing reflections on glass or darkening skies?
- Are there differences in autofocus or metering compatibility?
- Can either type be combined to make a variable ND setup?
I'm looking for a practical comparison of when to choose a linear polarizer versus a circular polarizer.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
4
What is called a "circular polarizer" in photography is just a linear polarizer combined with a quarter wave plate which converts the linear polarized light that comes out of the first part of the filter to circular polarized light. The conversion to circular polarized light makes the light behave the same as unpolarized in the camera thereby preventing the problems mentioned in WayneF's answer.
To construct an ND filter you can use a linear polarizer and behind that a circular polarizer. The quarter wave plate at the end then converts the linear polarized light that passes through both the filters to circular polarized light, so you are still free of problems.
A circular polarizer in the meaning of a filter that lets through only the left handed or right handed helicity component of light is just what you get if you flip an ordinary circular polarizer. The light then passes through the quarter wave plate first, which means that left handed helicity gets transformed to linear polarized light in one direction while the right handed component gets polarized in the orthogonal direction, the subsequent linear polarizer will then act on that linearly polarized light, it will let through only one component. What is then missing is another quarter wave plate to convert the linear polarized light back to left or right handed polarized light.
Originally by user28357. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user28357
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For image effect alone, both can polarize light and give the usual benefits: darker blue skies, stronger cloud contrast, and reduced reflections from non-metallic surfaces like glass or water. A circular polarizer is not weaker for these purposes.
The key difference is camera compatibility. A photographic circular polarizer is basically a linear polarizer plus a quarter-wave plate. That extra layer makes the light behave in a way that does not confuse many modern cameras’ autofocus and metering systems. A linear polarizer can still make a good photo, but on many DSLRs and other cameras with polarization-sensitive metering/AF paths, it may cause errors.
So, in practice:
- linear polarizer: fine optically for the image itself, but may interfere with AF/metering on modern cameras
- circular polarizer: same photographic benefit, generally the safe choice for modern cameras
For variable ND-style use, two polarizing elements can be combined. One answer notes a linear polarizer plus a circular polarizer can be used, with the circular filter’s quarter-wave plate preserving camera compatibility at the end of the stack.
Bottom line: if your camera uses modern AF/metering systems, buy a circular polarizer unless you know your camera is fully compatible with linear polarizers.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you do cross-polarization with linear polarizing sheets and a circular polarizer on the lens?
What’s the difference between linear and circular polarizing filters in photography?
Should I choose a linear or circular polarizer for DSLR use and for a DIY variable ND setup?
Can two polarizers be used as a variable ND filter, and what are the drawbacks vs a true ND filter?
How does a variable ND filter work, and does it also act like a polarizer?