What are good lower-cost alternatives to Lightroom for Windows photo workflow and noise reduction?
Asked 10/17/2010
2 views
2 answers
0
I currently use Picasa for basic organizing, tagging, cropping, and simple adjustments. I tried Lightroom and liked it, but as an amateur I find the price hard to justify. I’d like something more capable than Picasa, especially for RAW processing and noise reduction, but ideally cheaper than Lightroom. What Windows alternatives are worth considering?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
16
There are quite a few alternatives, depending somewhat on what you're after.
Workflow softwarePersonally, I like Bibble quite a bit. If memory serves, the Pro version is around the same price as LR, but the Lite version is quite a bit less expensive. One warning: while Bibble works well, they do have a history of being rather late delivering new versions (e.g., Bibble 5 was promised for something like 2 years before being delivered). For noise reduction, Bibble uses a version of Noise Ninja, which is (quite rightly, IMO) considered one of the best noise reduction programs available (though there are certainly others that are competitive).
Note: Bibble discontinued in favour of Corel AfterShot Pro
Raw Therapee is an open-source raw converter with decent noise reduction and a heavy emphasis on demosaicing algorithms to extract as as possible from any given raw data file. The goal here is more to get the most out of good pictures than reduce noise (and such) to save those that aren't so good.
SilkyPix Developer Studio Has pretty good noise reduction as well -- depending on the situation and picture involved, it's sometimes better than Noise Ninja (though other times it's not quite as good).
LightZone is yet another. Basically all the same kinds of features, as most of the others. I haven't used it enough to really comment on it in any detail though. Their big brag is their "Relight" -- one-click fix of exposure, contrast, etc. It seems to work reasonably well -- for one example, in the same league with Athentech Perfectly Clear (Ps Plugin, also included in Bibble Pro). Their noise reduction appears usable but doesn't seem to be anything special.
Aperture is Apple's workflow software. Given that it's from Apple, it's no surprise that it only runs under OS/X, so if you're a Windows user, you might as well move on to the next item. If you do use a Mac, it should probably be the first one you test. You might easily not bother looking at any others -- Aperture is easily competitive with (or, in the estimation of many Apple fans, clearly better than) anything else on the market.
editing softwareThese are much more like Photoshop than Lightroom.
Photoshop Elements was originally developed as an update to Photoshop LE. The first couple of versions were kind of lame (missing some features I'd consider truly crucial), but more recently it's not too bad. This is one, however, that pays to read some of the "tips and tricks" kind of papers/books/magazine articles -- quite a bit of what you can do is semi-hidden, so if you just use it for what's obvious, you see something much more limited than it really is -- though I haven't used the most recent version, so this may not be (as) true anymore.
PaintShop Pro X3 is another that started life (long before Corel bought it) as (at least IMO) a fairly worthless wannabe program you'd run across at Walmart for $19.95, but over the years they put in a lot of time and effort, and turned it into a serious photo editing program. I haven't used it a lot (actually, I haven't used X3 at all -- my most recent use was of X2) but it seems amazingly close to the capabilities of Ps even though the price is about the same as Ps Elements. The obvious advantage of Photoshop is support for roughly 10 zillion add-ons, plug-ins, presets, etc.
Originally by user603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user603
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—there are several solid Lightroom alternatives on Windows, and the best choice depends on whether you care more about workflow/cataloging or editing power.
Good options mentioned include:
- Bibble / Corel AfterShot Pro: A workflow-oriented RAW processor that was known for good performance and strong noise reduction via Noise Ninja. A lower-cost option than Lightroom in some versions.
- RawTherapee: A free, open-source RAW converter with a strong focus on image processing and decent noise reduction. Good if you want processing quality over polished asset management.
- Photoshop Elements: Often a strong value choice. It offers many useful editing tools, a photo-friendly interface, and some library/organization features.
- IMatch and Picajet FX: More worth a look if cataloging and asset management matter most, though editing features are not their main strength.
If your priority is noise reduction and RAW development, RawTherapee or AfterShot Pro are likely the closest fit. If you want a broader editing package with some organization tools, Photoshop Elements is a good middle ground.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What are some affordable alternatives to Adobe Lightroom for organizing and editing photos?
How do Picasa and Adobe Lightroom differ for photo organization and editing?
Do Photoshop CS5.5 and Bridge include Lightroom 3’s photo-editing features, or is Lightroom still worth buying?
Can Picasa write face/name tags to photo metadata for use in Lightroom?
Can Aperture use plug-ins for noise reduction comparable to Lightroom?