Do Photoshop CS5.5 and Bridge include Lightroom 3’s photo-editing features, or is Lightroom still worth buying?
Asked 12/16/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m upgrading from CS4 to Photoshop CS5.5 Design Premium and I’m wondering whether Lightroom 3 adds anything essential. I’ve heard Lightroom 3 has improved noise reduction and other useful photo features.
If I already have Photoshop CS5.5 (with Bridge/Camera Raw), will I miss any of Lightroom 3’s editing capabilities? Or is Lightroom mainly worthwhile for organizing, tagging, rating, and overall photo workflow rather than for unique image-processing tools?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
8
Lightroom and Photoshop aren't really (supposed to be) competing products -- they're complementary products that overlap. Lightroom is all about managing your workflow, which just happens to include image processing in most cases. Photoshop, on the other hand, is image processing to the max, but it doesn't really do much to help your workflow. There's very little you can do in Lightroom that you can't do in Photoshop, therefore, but if you're working on a lot of photos, you'll probably find that Lightroom saves you quite a bit of time.
The most common workflow for both of these products together uses Lightroom to import photos, then tag and cull them for further processing (or vice versa). A fair bit of general image processing can be done right in Lightroom, but for images that you really want to spend some time on, you can shoot those photos over to Photoshop for heavy-duty processing and (optionally) pull the results back into Lightroom.
For areas where these products overlap (RAW processing, etc.), they're generally either equivalent or in some cases actually use the same binary bits, so if you don't think you need the workflow portions of Lightroom, you shouldn't miss out on any of its image processing features. For what it's worth, people who value the workflow stuff in Lightroom but don't need to tap all the power of Photoshop can often get by with Lightroom plus Photoshop Elements -- that's a great combo, too.
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For image processing, you generally won’t miss much. Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS5.5 both rely on Adobe Camera Raw for RAW conversion, so core adjustments like noise reduction are essentially shared, just presented through different interfaces.
The main reason to buy Lightroom is workflow, not unique editing power. Lightroom is built for importing, organizing, tagging, rating, culling, metadata edits, and handling large batches of photos efficiently. Photoshop is the stronger pixel-level editor for heavy retouching, compositing, and other complex image edits.
Bridge can cover some organizational tasks, but Lightroom is usually smoother and more integrated for managing a large photo library. One limitation mentioned is that Bridge won’t give you the same kind of global metadata-based searching across your whole library.
So the short answer is: no, you’re not really missing Lightroom’s core RAW-processing features if you already have Photoshop CS5.5. Lightroom is worth buying if you want a faster, more photography-focused workflow and library management system.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What are the main benefits of upgrading from Photoshop CS3 to CS6?
What workflow benefits does Lightroom 3 offer over using Photoshop with Bridge?
What Linux software can I use to import, organize, and tag photos alongside AfterShot Pro?
How can I streamline a Windows RAW workflow for large numbers of Canon photos?
What are good learning resources for a Lightroom beginner, especially for workflow and organization?