Should I use a slim circular polarizer on an 11-16mm wide-angle lens, and are Cokin ND filters worth it?
Asked 6/6/2013
2 views
2 answers
0
I use a Canon T3i with a Tokina 11-16mm for landscapes and astro. I want to buy a circular polarizer and am deciding between a slim and normal filter. On a lens this wide, will a normal CPL vignette? If I buy a slim CPL, can I still stack another filter on it, or is that likely to cause vignetting?
I’m also considering graduated ND filters for landscapes and waterfalls. Are Cokin filters good enough for image quality, or do they tend to add a color cast? Would a square/holder system be better than screw-in graduated ND filters on an ultra-wide lens?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
2
For lenses that wide you do need the slim profile filters such as this one. Luckily for you it is half price these days. I bought it back in 2009 when it was full price...
I use that on my Sigma 10-20mm without vignetting. But I doubt you can attach yet another slim filter to it, without taking a vignette hit.
Cheaper option: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Kenko-77mm-Pro1-Digital-Wide-Band-Circular-PL-CPL-W-LPF-Filter-/120962042111
Originally by user11455. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11455
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
On an 11-16mm ultra-wide, a slim circular polarizer is the safer choice because standard-thickness filters are more likely to vignette. A slim CPL can work well on lenses in this range, but stacking another filter on top usually increases the risk of vignetting, especially at the wide end.
For graduated ND filters, a square/holder system is generally more useful than screw-in grads because you can slide the transition up and down to match the horizon. Screw-in graduated filters are limiting since the gradient position is fixed.
Cokin graduated filters are usable, but users often report some color cast. If you want more neutral results, Lee-style grads are generally regarded as better, though typically more expensive. Cokin P and Lee filters can be interchangeable in some holder systems, but holder costs may differ.
For landscapes and waterfalls: use a slim CPL if you need one, avoid stacking on the 11-16mm when possible, and consider a square graduated ND system if you want flexible horizon placement.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I choose a slim or regular circular polarizer for a Canon 550D with a Tokina 11-16mm?
Cokin vs Lee filter systems for landscape work on a wide-angle lens
Can I use different brands of square ND filters in the same holder?
Can you stack a circular ND behind a square graduated ND filter holder?
Which filters are useful on a Nikon 10-24mm ultra-wide lens for landscapes?