Should I upgrade my Canon 1200D body or buy a Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 first?
Asked 1/28/2015
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m learning photography with a Canon 1200D, the 18-55mm kit lens, and a 50mm f/1.8. I mostly shoot in low light and take a mix of portraits, landscapes, and everyday photos. I’m considering spending my budget on a Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8, but some friends suggest upgrading the camera body first for better high-ISO performance and dynamic range. With a budget around $700, which makes more sense at this stage: a new lens, a new body, or neither?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
1
This question has a clear cut answer typically, and even more so in your case. You mentioned specifically that you are in the learning phase.
I wouldn't spend any money, unless it is on books, training, or time! If you must spend money, the Sigma is a fantastic lens, but it isn't going to teach you how to take great photography, you already have everything you need to do that.
I would recommend discussing around friends(or internet sites) that don't encourage gear obsession(worry about DR, high noise ISO etc.) and instead drive you to take more photos and learn!
When your gear is what is truly limiting your photographic opportunities, you will have an absolutely clear understanding why and be able to answer this question yourself if necessary. Now is not the time. Go take some photos!
Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4892
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Given your current stage, the strongest advice is: neither body nor lens is likely to help as much as more shooting and learning.
You already have a capable beginner setup, including a fast 50mm f/1.8 for low light and portraits. A better body may improve noise and dynamic range, and the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 is an excellent lens, but neither will teach composition, exposure, timing, or light.
If you feel you must spend money, the Sigma is the more compelling upgrade than a body for your needs, especially since you shoot in low light. But the key point is that you probably haven’t hit a true gear limit yet. When your equipment is genuinely holding you back, the reason will usually be obvious from repeated real-world shooting.
So the best recommendation is: keep using your 1200D, 18-55, and 50mm, shoot a lot, and invest in practice, education, or training first. Upgrade later when you can clearly identify what your current setup cannot do for the photos you want.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
For wildlife on a budget, should I upgrade my lens or Canon 1100D body first?
Should a hobbyist upgrade camera gear now, or keep improving with current equipment?
Is the Canon EOS Rebel T6 a good beginner DSLR, and should I add an f/1.8 prime for portraits?
Should I buy a 35mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 as my first fast prime for a Nikon DX camera?
For indoor low-light shots of moving kids, should I upgrade my flash, lens, or camera body first?