Should I upgrade from a Canon 350D body or buy lenses first?

Asked 4/28/2020

86 views

2 answers

0

I’m starting out in photography using my mom’s Canon 350D (8MP) with the 18–55mm kit lens and an older 80–200mm zoom. I’m finding that I can’t crop very much without losing too much image quality. I also shoot in a snowy Arctic climate, so durability and weather resistance matter to me.

Would it make more sense to upgrade the camera body first, or spend the money on lenses such as a 50mm prime or a longer telephoto zoom?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

2

Your mom's camera has 8 megapixels. The 18-55mm kit lens is about optimal for a 8 megapixel camera. No need to upgrade that lens without upgrading the camera body.

I'll suggest you to get at least the EF-S 55-250mm IS STM lens. It's much cheaper than the EF 70-300mm IS USM lens. It's also cheaper than a new camera body.

The 70-300mm would be longer at the long end (which is a plus) but at the short end too (which is a minus), while being faster to autofocus, but very much heavier and also more pricey. However, the 70-300mm would support full frame camera bodies too.

Because, if you crop, there's a reason for it. The reason being that you didn't zoom enough. And why would be that the case? It would be the case if you can't zoom enough with the attached lens.

The EF-S 55-250mm IS STM lens allows you to use it in very mild telephoto conditions (55-80mm) that the 80-200mm lens cannot support, so it's more likely that the 55-250mm lens is actually attached to your camera, and also in long telephoto conditions (200-250mm) that the 80-200mm lens can support only by cropping.

The 50mm prime would only be a good idea if you take lots of portait pictures. If taking head-only portraits, consider the 85mm/1.8 lens too, it's more expensive than the 50mm lens, but of higher quality.

Snow on the ground does not matter unless you plan to drop your camera. Snowfall can matter. However, the weather-sealed lenses and cameras are very, very expensive. I'd suggest you to avoid using the camera when it rains, and perhaps purchase a small weatherproofed camera bag where you can put the camera when it begins to rain.

Originally by user81735. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user81735

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A newer body is the most broadly useful upgrade here. The 350D is very old, and compared with newer cameras it is limited in resolution and low-light performance, so cropping flexibility will be poor no matter what lens you use.

That said, lenses depend on what problem you’re trying to solve:

  • If you crop because your subject is too far away, a longer telephoto will help more than a 50mm prime.
  • A 50mm prime is mainly useful for better image quality, portraits, and low-light shooting, not for giving you more reach.

Based on the answers, a practical path is:

  1. Upgrade to a newer used Canon body first.
  2. If you need more reach, add a telephoto such as the EF-S 55-250mm IS STM rather than relying on cropping.

Your current 18–55mm kit lens is considered adequate for an 8MP body, so replacing it before the body is less compelling. Also note that entry-level Canon bodies generally are not weather sealed, so if weather resistance is a priority, check that specifically when choosing your next body.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer