Should I invest in editing software or buy more camera gear?
Asked 2/23/2012
9 views
2 answers
0
My current kit is already quite capable, and I’m deciding whether my next purchase should be more gear or better editing software. Right now I’m using GIMP and Darktable, which work but feel limiting compared with tools like Lightroom, Photoshop, or Aperture. In general, what tends to improve image quality more: upgrading software, or adding gear such as a flash, tripod, or lenses? And is paid software only worth it if you already know exactly how it will fit into your workflow?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
3
Your existing gear is very good. You have a good camera body (D90) a fast f/1.4 lens and the Tamron is a good, sharp lens as well. I don't think you'll improve your images markedly by upgrading camera body or lenses.
A good quality editing tool like Lightroom or Photoshop, along with carefully chosen presets and plugins, can certainly help your workflow, save time, and possibly increase quality somewhat. But as a rule software isn't going to save images that aren't captured well in camera. Now it could be that your post processing isn't all that hot, but if that's the case you'd probably benefit from some instruction and practice more than better software.
Photography is all about light, and it sounds like you've identified that your biggest issue is lack of natural light. It would seem likely that you ought to look at artificial lighting, whether it's small flashes or larger lights. Even something simple like using a reflector might throw enough extra light on your subject to improve shots dramatically.
Originally by user4191. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4191
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
If your current camera and lenses are already solid, more hardware may not improve your images much by itself. Better software can improve workflow, save time, and add some quality gains, but it generally won’t rescue weak captures. In most cases, the biggest improvement comes from better light, technique, and practice.
Based on the answers, the most useful gear additions are likely a flash and a good tripod/head. A flash can dramatically improve photos by giving you control over light, whether bounced on-camera or used off-camera. A quality tripod can improve sharpness and make careful shooting easier.
As for software: tools like Lightroom, Photoshop, or Aperture can be worthwhile if your current software is slow, unstable, or gets in the way of editing. They’re especially valuable for workflow and convenience. But if post-processing skill is the real limitation, instruction and practice may help more than buying software.
So: prioritize lighting and technique first, consider a flash or tripod if those are missing, and buy software if it clearly solves workflow frustrations you already experience.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I buy Photoshop, or is Lightroom/GIMP enough for a growing photography business?
What’s a good next step up from Picasa for RAW post-processing on Linux?
Should a hobbyist upgrade camera gear now, or keep improving with current equipment?
Is a Canon Rebel T5 a good first DSLR, or should I choose a T5i/SL1 instead?
How can you tell when you’ve outgrown your camera or lens?