Panasonic GF3 kit lens choice: 14mm f/2.5 pancake or 14-42mm zoom?
Asked 1/22/2012
1 views
2 answers
0
I'm considering a Panasonic GF3 as an upgrade from a fixed-lens compact and I'm trying to choose between the two common kit lens options: the 14mm f/2.5 pancake prime and the 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom.
I understand the basic differences in focal length and maximum aperture, but I want to know what those differences mean in practice:
- Is the main difference just fixed focal length vs zoom range and a brighter max aperture?
- Which lens would be better to pair with a Raynox DCR-250 close-up attachment for macro-style shots?
- Which would be the better choice for landscapes?
Size matters to me, so the compactness of the 14mm pancake is appealing, but I don't want to give up too much flexibility if the 14-42mm is the better all-around lens.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
7
I will present the "quick and dirty" version of my answer, because I could talk on this topic for pages and pages. Essentially the 14mm f/2.5 "pancake" is a prime lens, which means it does not zoom, it has one fixed focal length. So instead of zooming in and out to frame your subject, you have to move your feet along with the camera! The fixed focal length usually comes with a few advantages such as:
- Large apertures that zoom lenses do not have
- Very high quality optics due to easier manufacturing of the single focal length
- Size can be a huge advantage, and only primes can really get the "pancake" form factor
The other option you are looking at is a general purpose zoom lens. The 14-42mm is equivalent to 28-84mm angle of view in the 35mm format, which is handy to know when comparing it to something like your old Olympus XZ-1 6-24mm, which had a 28-112mm 35mm equivalent angle of view. So the easiest way for you to compare the lenses on the two cameras you are considering is probably the following when considering the field of view:
- 14mm "pancake" = 28mm field of view
- 14-42mm = 28-84mm field of view
- 6-24mm = 28-112mm
Someone else will likely chime in and explain how I forgot a few important details when explaining focal length conversions and field of view, but this is the simplest way I can explain it to you that I hope will make sense to a beginner. What is important to understand, is the "field of view", in that, the pancake lens will look just like your current Olympus zoomed all the way out. And the 14-42mm standard zoom will look almost like the Olympus - but will not let you zoom in quite as far.
Other things to consider as you suggested, is the maximum aperture. This is how much light the lens will let into the camera, and is very important. The larger the better. f/2.5 is the maximum the pancake lens will allow, and f/3.5 is the maximum the standard zoom will allow. Your old camera had a maximum of f/1.8 which is larger then both of these Panasonic lenses. Both zoom lenses have variable maximum apertures, so as you zoom in the maximum aperture becomes smaller, which is not a great thing. The prime "pancake" lens has only one maximum aperture since it does not zoom, which is a good thing.
I hope this helps shed a bit of light on what to purchase. In the end the choice between a prime lens and a standard zoom is really up to you, the user. I would say that the majority of people end up with a standard zoom at first, and as a second lens they may choose a prime, but this may not be the correct choice for everyone.
Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4892
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
No—the difference is more than just “3x zoom vs one extra stop.” The 14mm f/2.5 is a prime lens, so it has a fixed focal length. In exchange, primes are often smaller, can have a wider maximum aperture, and often have optical advantages. The 14-42mm is a general-purpose zoom, giving you a much more flexible framing range.
For landscapes, both can work well because 14mm on Micro Four Thirds is a wide-angle view, but the zoom is more versatile since you can choose wider or tighter framing without moving.
For a Raynox DCR-250, the more practical choice is usually the zoom, because close-up attachments tend to be easier to work with when you can vary focal length and framing.
So the best choice depends on priorities:
- Choose the 14mm f/2.5 if you want the smallest package, a brighter lens, and are happy working with one focal length.
- Choose the 14-42mm if you want flexibility, especially as a first lens and for experimenting with different subjects, including close-ups and landscapes.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Are there affordable faster zoom options for Micro Four Thirds, or should I use primes instead?
Should I replace my Lumix G2 kit lens with the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 for travel and night photography?
What’s the difference between the Olympus 14-42mm II R and 14-42mm EZ kit lenses for an OM-D E-M10 Mark II?
Can a Raynox DCR-250 work well on the Panasonic GF3 14-42mm kit lens for macro?
How important is lens stabilization for a 40–150mm lens on a Panasonic Micro Four Thirds body?