What’s the difference between the Olympus 14-42mm II R and 14-42mm EZ kit lenses for an OM-D E-M10 Mark II?
Asked 3/13/2018
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m buying an Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II as my first serious camera and need to choose a kit lens. The cheaper option includes the Olympus 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R, while another kit includes the 14-42mm “EZ” / pancake-style lens for about 20 euros more. What are the practical differences between these two lenses, and would either be better for a beginner?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
2
The main difference is in the size of each lens.
- The ED 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 EZ is often called a "pancake" lens. It is very compact when stowed in the unused position.
But in use the center of the lens extends.
There's a lot more in terms of optics inside this one than your average "pancake" lens:
- The 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R looks like a more typical type lens with a 50mm or so barrel length in the "stowed" position.
It too extends and is almost twice that length when in use.
You don't give up anything in the way of image quality in exchange for the compactness of the pancake when compared to the other lens, but you don't really gain anything either. Comparing the two lenses at various focal lengths and apertures at imaging resource gives a slight advantage to one in some places, and to the other in other places. All of the variation could very well be within the range of cop-to-copy variation of two copies of the same model of either lens. Overall the "EZ" may be just a bit sharper than the "II R", but it is not decisively so.
The "EZ" has a power motor that automatically retracts the lens when the camera's power is turned off and automatically extends the lens when the camera is turned on. The lens also zooms using this powered motor via a 'fly-by-wire' connected zoom ring. The "II R" has a more traditional mechanically connected zoom ring that the user must operated themselves after moving an 'Unlock' switch to stow the lens in the compact position.
Both lenses use a 'focus-by-wire' system for manual focusing. The "II R" has a wider, easier to use manual focusing ring. The "EZ" has a very narrow focusing ring at the very front of the main lens barrel with very little separation between the focusing ring and the 'zoom-by-wire' ring just behind it.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main practical difference is size and handling. The 14-42mm EZ is the very compact “pancake” version: it folds down smaller and is nicer if portability matters. The 14-42mm II R is physically larger and works more like a traditional zoom lens.
For image quality, the answers suggest there isn’t a major advantage either way. You’re not really giving up much by choosing the compact EZ, but you’re not gaining a clear optical improvement either.
Where they differ more is in use:
- EZ: smaller, more convenient to carry, often preferred for video.
- II R: easier and quicker to change focal length, which can help for still photography, especially with moving subjects.
So for a beginner:
- Choose the EZ if you want the smallest, most travel-friendly setup.
- Choose the II R if you want simpler, more direct zoom control for everyday photography.
Either lens is a reasonable starter option on the E-M10 Mark II.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is the Olympus 14-42mm kit lens much smaller than Nikon's 18-55mm kit lens?
Which lenses should I consider for an Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II for wide-angle, macro, time-lapse, and astrophotography?
Why do my close-up photos show harsh double outlines in out-of-focus areas?
Why is ISO blinking on my Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II in Aperture Priority at dusk?
Olympus 14-42mm EZ kit lens extends and retracts repeatedly, then camera shows a black screen



