Pack-and-head vs monolight studio strobes: pros, cons, and best uses
Asked 1/22/2011
6 views
2 answers
0
For mains-powered studio flash systems, what are the practical advantages and disadvantages of a central pack-and-head setup compared with monolights, where each light has its own power supply? Are there situations where one type is generally better suited than the other?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
13
In general you can pump more power through a pack and head system, they're also more versatile (lots of different setup options, you can mix and match). Monolights are lighter weight in total and more compact and so suitable for mobile shooting, they're cheaper and easier for beginners to use.
This is a generalisation however, each system has it's own pros and cons:
Pack and head
- + The heads are easier to position as they are lighter than monolights
- + Can use the heads with different power sources i.e. mains and battery
- + Single power pack for multiple heads (modularity)
- - Single point of failure (the power pack)
- - Wires everywhere!
- + You can control the power output centrally (instead of climbing up a ladder)
- - You tend to have less control in general (the older ones can't adjust the power to each head individually)
- + You only need one radio trigger / sync lead per pack
Monolights
- + Simpler, lighter, more compact
- + Usually cheaper
- + Each light can be plugged into a wall socket locally
- - Limited to a single power source (mains)
- - Power output tends to be lower
- - Have to adjust power output on the head itself, which may be remote (unless you have a newer head with remote power control)
- - Likewise each head must be triggered individually (though optical slaves make this easier)
As you can see they are each useful in certain situations. A lot of people own / use both, for example the main lights might be powered of a single pack with a few monolight satellites which are further away.
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Both can work well; the better choice depends on how you shoot.
Pack-and-head systems put the power electronics in one central pack and connect lighter flash heads to it. Their main advantages are higher potential power, modularity, lighter heads that are easier to boom or mount high, and centralized power control. They can also let you use the same heads with different power sources. Downsides: more cables, a single point of failure if the pack dies, and some systems offer less independent control per head.
Monolights have the power supply built into each unit. They’re generally more compact, easier to transport, simpler for beginners, and often less expensive. Because each light is self-contained, there’s no central pack to fail. The tradeoff is that each unit is heavier on the stand, and adjusting settings may mean going to each light individually.
In general, pack-and-head systems are often preferred for higher-power studio setups and situations where lighter heads and central control matter. Monolights are often better for mobile shooting, smaller setups, and users who want simplicity and lower cost.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Studio strobes vs speedlights for portrait work: pros, cons, and when power matters
Elinchrom D-Lite 4 vs Ranger Quadra: what’s the real difference?
Softboxes vs shoot-through and reflective umbrellas for portrait lighting
Continuous lights vs strobes for starting a small portrait studio
Grids vs. snoots for controlling studio light