Continuous lights vs strobes for starting a small portrait studio
Asked 2/15/2011
5 views
2 answers
0
I’m setting up a simple studio for portraits, headshots, and possibly pets. What are the main pros and cons of continuous lighting compared with strobes when choosing my first lighting setup? I’m especially interested in exposure control, motion freezing, comfort for subjects, modifier options, cost, and whether one option is better for beginners.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
21
Studio strobes:
- + More light means lower ISO, larger aperture etc.
- + Can freeze motion
- + Can overpower the ambient light meaning you can leave the room lights on to see what you're doing
- + Greater choice of flash units / accessories / lighting modifiers
- + Can be used with battery pack for location shoots
- - Have to be triggered somehow
- - Need to use a flash meter, or test shots to set exposure
- - Can be too bright (some have limited options to turn the power right down)
- - Can be more expensive to start off with
Continous Lighting
- + Can be done on the cheap using gear lying around the house
- + Can use the camera's metering system
- + Can be used for video as well
- + No need to trigger
- - Limited power output
- - Can cook your subject
- - High levels of ambient light can be undesirable when working
- - Fire risk with homemade mods!
- - There can be colour issues with some florescents
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For portraits and similar studio work, strobes are usually the more flexible choice. They provide much more light, which helps you keep ISO low, use the aperture you want, and freeze motion better—useful for kids, pets, hair movement, and quick expressions. They can also overpower ambient room light, and there’s generally a wider range of flash units and modifiers available. Downsides: you need a trigger, and exposure is set with a flash meter or test shots rather than simple in-camera metering. Some strobes also don’t turn down very far, and startup cost can be higher.
Continuous lights are simpler to understand because what you see is what you get, and your camera meter works normally. They’re also useful if you want to shoot video, and you may be able to start cheaply. But they often have limited power, which can force higher ISO or slower shutter speeds, making motion blur more likely. Traditional continuous lights can run hot, and very bright lights may make subjects uncomfortable or squint.
If your focus is still portraits/headshots/pets, strobes are generally the better long-term studio tool. If you also need video, want the simplest learning curve, or have a very tight budget, continuous lighting can still make sense.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Softboxes vs shoot-through and reflective umbrellas for portrait lighting
Flash vs LED for a DIY home macro studio
Budget beauty dish for a Canon 580EX: ePhoto vs Cowboy Studio for learning off-camera flash
Canvas or muslin vs seamless paper for studio backdrops
What camera settings and lighting setup work best for indoor formal headshots?