ND filter vs HSS in daylight: which is better for freezing motion with flash?
Asked 11/4/2019
4 views
2 answers
0
When shooting outdoors in bright daylight, I know I can use an ND filter to stay at normal flash sync speed while using a wide aperture and flash/strobe on the subject. I can also use high-speed sync (HSS) and a shutter speed faster than sync speed to get a similar exposure.
What is the practical difference between these approaches? Is HSS only really necessary when I need a faster shutter speed to freeze motion, or are there other reasons to choose HSS over an ND filter? How do ND and HSS compare specifically for stopping subject motion?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
7
Just to get the full understanding: Only to freeze fast moving subjects which need shorter shutter speeds than the flash's burning speed HSS is really required?
Sort of. That is a common reason to use HSS, but there are also other use cases where HSS may be preferable to using ND filters.
- When you also want to use narrower apertures interspersed with wide apertures during a shoot and don't have the time to add/subtract the ND filter(s) between different aperture settings.
- When the subject is static but other things in the background are not. Think about things such as leaves on trees or wind chimes on a porch that are in the frame with your portrait subject during a windy day. The short exposure time (Tv for "time value") will freeze things in the background that may be distracting if they are blurred even if your static subject is not.
It also depends on exactly how short of an exposure you need. HSS loses more power for a shutter time of, say, 1/8000 than it does for 1/1000. It may be more efficient to use ND filters and get brighter flash output to freeze the subject with a slower Tv than to use lower powered flash output at very short Tv without an ND filter. Where the "crossover' point is depends on how bright the ambient light is compared to the total flash power available.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
HSS is not only for fast-moving subjects, but that’s one common reason to use it.
Key difference: with normal flash at or below sync speed, the flash burst can help freeze motion because it is very brief. With HSS, the flash behaves more like a continuous light source made of many pulses while the shutter slit travels, so the shutter speed becomes the main factor in stopping motion.
An ND filter does something different: it reduces both ambient light and flash equally, letting you stay at normal sync speed and often use the flash at full power. That can give you more flash power relative to daylight than HSS, since HSS typically reduces maximum flash output significantly.
Choose HSS when:
- you need faster shutter speeds
- you want to freeze movement in the background (leaves, hair, etc.)
- you want to switch quickly between apertures without adding/removing ND filters
Choose ND when:
- you want wider apertures in bright light while staying at normal sync speed
- you need maximum flash power
- you want the flash burst, rather than shutter speed, to do more of the motion-freezing
So for freezing motion: HSS helps by allowing a faster shutter, but normal flash with ND can often freeze the flashed subject better if the flash duration is shorter than the motion.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How does high-speed sync let a flash work above the camera’s X-sync speed?
Do leaf shutter lenses need HSS-capable strobes for flash at high shutter speeds?
What kind of camera/flash setup do I need to freeze fast motion with flash at night?
How do flash sync speed and high-speed sync affect outdoor flash on the Sony A7C?
Does shutter speed affect flash exposure when using high-speed sync (HSS)?