Is upgrading from a Canon EOS 350D to a 550D a noticeable image-quality improvement?
Asked 12/4/2011
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m an enthusiastic amateur using a Canon EOS 350D with a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 50mm f/1.8, and Canon 70-200mm f/4L plus a 1.4x extender. I mainly shoot birds and landscapes.
I’m wondering whether the 350D body is now the main limitation on image quality, especially with the telephoto lens. If I upgrade to a Canon EOS 550D, how much real-world improvement should I expect? Will the newer sensor and higher pixel count make a noticeable difference, particularly for bird photography and cropping?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
5
The difference can be huge or unnoticeable depending on how you use the camera - for example, the faster burst rate means nothing if you never use burst mode or can make a huge difference if you always shoot in burst mode - also better low light performance means nothing if you always shoot in bright sunlight.
You shouldn't be asking if the camera body is a limiting factor - you should be asking yourself what it is you don't like about your photos and then ask here how to fix the problem (and most likely the way to fix the specific problem does not require a new camera body).
But buying equipment is fun, you can always use the specs to rationalize buying a new body - just think of that wonderful full HD video of birds in flight you can make with the 550D (Important note: I believe shooting video of birds in flight with a DSLR is insanely difficult)
BTW: I have the 550D and I love it, I use it mostly indoors at higher ISO than people here are usually comfortable with and it produces great pictures.
Originally by user2481. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2481
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, you can expect some real improvements from a 550D, but whether they feel significant depends on what’s limiting you now.
Compared with the 350D, the 550D offers higher resolution, somewhat better dynamic range, better high-ISO/low-light performance, a faster burst rate, a much better rear screen, and video. For bird photography, the biggest practical gain is usually the extra resolution, which gives you more room to crop. The modest burst-rate improvement can also help with action.
That said, a newer body won’t automatically transform your photos. If you mostly shoot in good light, don’t crop heavily, and aren’t limited by burst speed or ISO performance, the difference may be modest. Your 350D is still capable of excellent images, especially with the lenses you listed.
A good rule is: upgrade only if you can point to a specific problem the new body will solve—such as needing more cropping flexibility, better low-light results, or improved handling/features. If you don’t have a clear limitation, the upgrade may be nice rather than essential.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How much image quality loss should I expect from a Canon EF 1.4x III Extender on a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II with a 7D Mark II?
Is there a good 1.7x teleconverter for Canon EF, or should I use a 1.4x and crop with the EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II?
Why are my photos soft with a Canon 1.4x extender on a 100-400mm lens?
Should I upgrade my Rebel XT body or buy better lenses first?
Which Canon extender works best with the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM?