Is the Sigma dp3 Quattro suitable for macro photography?
Asked 5/26/2015
2 views
2 answers
0
I’d like to photograph everyday subjects around 1–5 cm in size and am wondering whether the Sigma dp3 Quattro can work for this instead of buying a dedicated macro lens. It has manual focus, a telephoto lens, and a minimum focus distance of about 22 cm. I know it isn’t designed as a macro camera, and I’m mainly interested in whether it can give useful close-up results for centimeter-sized subjects without excessive cropping.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
2
The Sigma DP3 Quattro has a reasonable maximum magnification of 0.33x but with it's large APS-C sensor that means you aren't going to be able to fill the frame with anything smaller than 70mm x 45mm
If you want to shoot something around 1cm in size you will have to crop the image massively at the expense of resolution. For this reason I'd say the DP3 Quattro is not a good camera for macro photography on it's own. You may be able to get close up adapters that screw on the front of the lens to decrease the minimum focus distance. Image quality will suffer though, in the end there are few substitutes for a dedicated macro lens.
See this question for other macro lens alternatives:
What macro techniques offer an alternative to expensive optics?
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The Sigma dp3 Quattro can do close-up work, but it is limited for true macro.
Its maximum magnification is about 0.33×, which on an APS-C sensor means the smallest subject you can fill the frame with is roughly 70 × 45 mm. So for subjects around 5 cm, it may be usable, but for 1 cm subjects you would need heavy cropping, which reduces resolution.
That means it’s not a strong choice for macro photography on its own if you want frame-filling shots of small objects. A dedicated macro lens is still the better solution because there are few real substitutes for the magnification and image quality of a true macro lens.
If you want to experiment, a screw-on close-up adapter may let you focus closer, but image quality may suffer. In short: workable for larger close-ups, not ideal for serious macro.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What does it mean if a camera’s normal and macro focus ranges are the same?
Why do compact cameras quote much shorter minimum focus distances than interchangeable-lens cameras?
What camera and lens features matter most for still-life product photography?
Can the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 be used for anything besides extreme macro?
How can I make a fixed-focus webcam focus at 5–20 cm for close-up work?