Is slight back-focus with a Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 on a Canon 1000D a defect?

Asked 7/14/2016

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m testing a new Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 on a Canon 1000D/XS and seeing what looks like consistent back-focus when using viewfinder autofocus. The camera is on a tripod, lens at 11mm and f/2.8. I compared a Live View manual-focus shot with shots focused using the center AF point, and the AF result appears to land a few centimeters behind the intended target each time.

Since the 1000D has no AF microadjust, I’m trying to decide whether this is likely a defective lens that should be returned, or whether some amount of inaccuracy is normal with this kind of ultra-wide lens and phase-detect AF. Can this be reliably calibrated, and how should I judge whether the behavior is outside normal limits?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

1

It is within the realm of possibility that the lens is back focusing. To confirm this and measure exactly to what degree, though, the target and distance scales need to be properly aligned with the camera.

There are a couple of reasons why good alignment is needed to get a valid AF test measurement:

  • If the camera is aimed at an angle to a target such as you have created then the distance from the camera to the "T" on the target is not precisely the same as the distance to the "0" point on the scale beneath it and to the side.
  • Your AF system will attempt to focus on the area of greatest contrast within the entire active area of the AF point(s) selected. The area of sensitivity for most AF points is quite a bit larger than the indicator square that you see in the viewfinder. Modern AF systems often have overlapping areas of sensitivity between adjacent points. If the camera is not perpendicular to the target then the camera may be trying to focus on an area closer or further from the camera than the spot at which you think you are aiming it. For more, please see Which offers better results: FoCal or LensAlign Pro? and Are of cross-type focus points more accurate, or just faster?

If it turns out the lens is consistently missing in one direction with the 1000D, which lacks AF Micro Adjustment capability, you have a couple of options:

  • Exchange the lens and hope the manufacturing tolerances of the next one matches up better with the manufacturing tolerances of your camera.
  • Send both the lens and your camera to an authorized Tokina service center and let them adjust the lens to the camera.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Not necessarily a defect. With an ultra-wide lens at 11mm, viewfinder phase-detect AF can be less precise because the AF sensor has limited resolution and depth of field is already very large, even at f/2.8. That can make small focus errors look consistent without meaning the lens is truly faulty.

Also, your test setup may not be reliable unless the target and scale are carefully aligned. If the camera is angled to the target, the marked focus point and the ruler marks are at different distances, and the AF point may also be grabbing a different high-contrast area than you expect.

What the answers suggest is:

  • Re-test with a properly aligned AF target.
  • Compare viewfinder AF against Live View focus.
  • Expect Live View focus to be the more accurate reference.

If Live View is accurate but viewfinder AF is slightly off at 11mm, that may be normal behavior for this lens/camera combination rather than a clear defect. Since your 1000D has no AF microadjust, there’s no user calibration option. If the error is large in real-world shooting or clearly repeatable in a proper test, returning it is reasonable; otherwise, you may simply need to rely on Live View for critical focus.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer