Is Photo Mechanic faster than Lightroom for importing photos?

Asked 6/29/2013

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m finding Lightroom slow when importing and rendering images, so I’m considering using Photo Mechanic for ingesting files. If Lightroom is set to minimal previews and smart previews are off, will Photo Mechanic still import faster, or is file copying basically the same speed?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Usually, yes—Photo Mechanic is often perceived as faster for ingesting and culling than Lightroom. Lightroom’s import speed can vary a lot depending on settings like preview generation, whether it builds larger previews, and when it renders full-size images. If Lightroom is set to minimal previews and smart previews are off, the gap may be smaller, since simple file copying itself is limited by your card, drive, and computer speed. The big difference is that Photo Mechanic is designed primarily for fast ingesting, browsing, and selecting images, while Lightroom also handles cataloging and editing tasks that can slow the process. So if your priority is getting images in and reviewing them quickly, Photo Mechanic may feel much faster. If you need Lightroom’s editing and library features, it’s a different tool with different tradeoffs. The most reliable answer for your setup is to test both on the same card and files.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

0

With Lightroom, you can choose what quality level you want the preview images to be, and also what level of quality you want the full sized image to be while you are working on it, and whether you want each image "ingested" (as you put it) when you import the image or not until you open the image. So there can be a great variation within Lightroom based on the settings you select.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

13y ago

Your Answer