Is it worth buying Sony E-mount lenses for a NEX camera?

Asked 3/29/2013

5 views

2 answers

0

I’ve only used kit lenses so far, but I really like my Sony NEX camera and I’m considering buying dedicated E-mount lenses. Some of them are expensive, so I’m trying to decide whether it makes sense to build a lens kit around this system.

Specifically:

  • Is Sony E-mount likely to remain supported for a long time?
  • Are E-mount lenses a sensible long-term purchase compared with upgrading camera bodies?
  • What are the practical limitations of the E-mount lens lineup, and what kinds of lenses might be harder to find?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

4

As an owner of an NEX-6 and two of the more expensive lenses currently available for it (the Sony 18-200mm zoom and the Sony Zeiss 24mm F1.8), and with the warning that I may be doing nothing more than reinforcing my own biases, I would say that, if they meet your needs, you shouldn't hesitate to purchase E-mount lenses. Why?

First, the mirrorless camera industry in general and Sony's NEX line specifically seem to be doing quite well. My evidence is anecdotal, but clearly there's a great deal of market momentum in the mirrorless segment, and Sony has received quite good reviews for their NEX cameras. Four of Snapsort's top five mirrorless cameras are NEX models, and the only one that isn't, the Leica M 240, costs approximately seven times that of the most expensive NEX model.

Second, the E-mount system has excellent choices for a variety of purposes now. Sony themselves offers 13 different lenses plus two converters in the E-mount format, with lens list prices from $250 up to $1,200, and with focal lengths from 10mm to 210mm. (You can find the Wikipedia article with a good overview of the lenses here.)

Third, the E-mount system has attracted third party support. Tamron, Sigma, and Zeiss all make E-mount lenses with autofocus and full electronic control. I personally tend towards fewer better lenses, and so my interest is mostly in the Zeiss lenses. The image samples from their new 12mm/F2.8 and 32mm/F1.8 lenses have been stunning, at least to my eyes. And Zeiss has more lenses forthcoming, with an a 50mm/F2.8 macro lens due later this year.

There are plenty of lenses you won't be able to find that are specifically designed for E-mount. If you want an 800mm telephoto lens, or a tilt-shift lens, or a fisheye lens with a full-frame-equivalent aperture of 8mm, and you want them tuned for E-mount, with full autofocus and electronic control of the aperture, then you need to keep looking. But these are fairly specialized requirements; my hunch is that if you had them, you'd already know the answers and so wouldn't be looking at NEX -- you'd be focused on full-frame formats, probably Canon or Nikon.

Ultimately, a question you should ask yourself is this: given the E-mount lenses that are available now or that have been definitively announced for near-future availability, could you purchase a camera-plus-lenses set that would give you enough years of usage to make the original investment reasonable on a per-photo basis? If so, then dive in and have fun!

Originally by user19407. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user19407

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—if E-mount lenses fit the way you shoot, they’re generally a better long-term purchase than camera bodies. Bodies tend to become outdated much faster, while lenses often remain useful for many years.

That said, “investment” is not the best way to think about camera gear. Buy lenses to solve a need: better image quality, a wider aperture, more reach, wider angle, etc. If your kit lens already does what you need, there’s no reason to rush.

As for system longevity, no mount is guaranteed forever, but lens mounts usually last a long time, and mirrorless—especially Sony’s NEX/E-mount line—has shown strong market momentum. That makes E-mount a reasonable system to buy into.

The main caution is lineup breadth. More established mounts like Canon EF or Nikon F have historically offered wider native lens selections, especially in niche areas. With E-mount, depending on your needs, some specialized options may be fewer or more expensive.

So the practical answer is: don’t buy lenses just to “invest”; buy the lenses your photography actually needs. If E-mount has the focal lengths and apertures you want, it’s a sensible system to build around.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer