Is it better to transfer photos by USB from the camera or use a card reader?

Asked 5/8/2016

4 views

2 answers

0

I’ve usually removed the memory card and used a dedicated card reader, mainly because older cameras were slow over USB and their transfer software was awkward. With newer cameras, cards, and USB standards, is that still the best approach?

What are the practical pros and cons of connecting the camera directly by USB versus taking the card out and using a dedicated reader? I’m interested in transfer speed, compatibility, battery drain/charging, and whether camera software offers any real advantages.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

3

Card-Reader Can Still be Faster

A camera might be designed to write 35 megabytes per second to the card and handle the “U1” standard, and reading back out is oddly capped at 20 Mbytes/s due to the USB chip used, which is only USB-2.

You can buy even faster cards, e.g. “U3”, and USB-3–based readers that can let you dump the card at 95 Mbytes/s.

This will probably always be true as the hardware cycles up. You will be able to find even faster cards that are compatible with the camera, and even faster readers to use when dumping them.

Camera's Reader Might be Hard to Beat

The Canon 1D X Mark II has gigabit ethernet for a transfer interface. The camera's CFast card is faster than any USB-3 card reader could produce.

Built-In Bridge is Not Nice

Although the OS has built-in knowledge of a standard file transfer protocol for cameras now, some cameras might not be quite compatible with that and demand their own special drivers and bloatware, even if you then ignore that and use standard file transfer tools.

The camera mounting might not be a full file system that appears for use with all file-based tools, but only works with the operating system GUI shell for dragging files. That makes it difficult to use a script to copy-and-verify, for example.

Camera's Utility Software Can be Good

The EOS utility might in fact be your preferred transfer method.

Bundled brand-specific software might take specific advantage of the camera's direct connection. 3rd party software is likely to use a file system mount as well as photo-transfer protocol, if copying the files is all it's doing.

Power—good

Some cameras might recharge on the USB, so you can charge and transfer at the same time. Or at least transfer and then turn off to charge without moving it. If it takes 2 hours to copy the files off, hopefully it will turn off by itself or switch to charge mode by itself unattended, so that's more of a potential benefit. (Please edit with real examples if you have one and use it that way)

Power-bad

The spent cards and battery get taken out of the camera, with the batteries going to the charger and the cards going to the computer. Leaving a battery in to use the camera as a card reader would be more hassle.

With it taking hours to transfer all the files from a large card, the use of battery power on the part of the "reader" might be a bad idea in general.

Originally by user33948. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user33948

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

In most cases, a dedicated card reader is still the better choice, mainly for speed and convenience. Many cameras still transfer slower than a good reader because their built-in interface may be limited, even if the card itself is capable of much faster read speeds. A faster card can often be read at full speed in a compatible reader even if the camera can’t take full advantage of it over USB.

That said, it depends on the camera. Some higher-end models with USB 3 or gigabit Ethernet can be as fast as, or close to, a reader. But those are exceptions rather than the norm.

Other tradeoffs:

  • Card reader: usually fastest, doesn’t use camera battery, and lets you keep using the camera.
  • Camera via USB: can be more convenient, avoids handling the card, and bundled software may help with automatic folder creation, renaming, sorting by date, and previews during import.

So the current situation is: card readers still generally win for raw transfer performance, while direct camera connection can be worthwhile for workflow features or on cameras with especially fast interfaces.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer