Is it better to learn exposure on a film camera or switch to digital?
Asked 12/16/2018
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to photography and recently started using a Canon AE-1 I found in my grandma’s attic. The camera seems to work, but I haven’t had my first rolls developed yet, so I’m not sure whether any mistakes will be from the camera or from my own settings. I only partly understand aperture, shutter speed, and exposure, and I’m trying to decide how to learn.
Should I keep practicing on the AE-1, or would a digital camera be a better way to learn exposure and the basics of photography?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
6
The advantages to learning exposure with digital are that it doesn't cost you any more to make more exposures (no film/development costs) and immediate feedback. You can instantly see the effect of setting change when you take the image (or if you're using a camera where you compose on the LCD or through an electronic viewfinder in liveview, before you take the shot with exposure simulation). In addition, each image you take will have embedded metadata that will let you check later on what iso, aperture, and shutter speed settings you used. Film doesn't dot that, and you have to keep notes, which can be awkward while you're shooting.
But on the flip side, film will give you shot discipline in mental editing quite a bit harder before you mash that button that digital spray'n'prayers may never learn. :) The main problem here with your AE-1 is that you may not know if it's working correctly or needs to be service as well as your skillset not yet being able to figure out where you might have gone wrong if the exposure isn't right.
But you don't necessarily have to use a digital camera if the film camera works fine (no light leaks, broken parts, etc.) it might be worth it for you to put a light metering app on your smartphone. Some of them do exposure simulation and if they match your AE-1's exposure, then maybe it's a way to have a preview first before you shoot.
Originally by user27440. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user27440
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For most beginners, digital is the easier and more efficient way to learn exposure.
Digital gives you immediate feedback, lets you shoot a lot without film/development cost, and records the settings for each frame so you can review what worked. That makes it much easier to connect aperture, shutter speed, and ISO to the results you see.
Film can still teach you good habits. It encourages slower, more deliberate shooting and can be a great way to learn if you specifically want to learn film photography. But it’s less convenient for experimentation, more expensive per shot, and harder to diagnose mistakes because you don’t see results right away. Film can also add extra variables like development and scanning.
So the practical advice is: if your main goal is learning photography basics and exposure quickly, use digital. If you’re excited by film itself, it’s fine to keep using the AE-1 too—just expect a slower learning process. Interest and consistency matter more than the format.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I learn to use my Canon EOS Rebel XTi beyond Auto mode?
Good beginner film camera under €50, or is an older digital camera better for learning?
Can reviewing old photos and their EXIF settings help you improve as a photographer?
Which affordable manual-focus film SLR is good for learning the basics?
Is buying a camera and learning by shooting a good way to start photography?