Is focal length defined differently in optics and photography?

Asked 12/25/2020

7 views

2 answers

0

I’m confused about whether “focal length” means different things in physics/optics versus photography.

In basic optics, a thin lens’s focal length is the distance from the lens to the point where parallel rays (from an object at infinity) come to focus.

In photography, I’ve seen focal length discussed in relation to the sensor, which made me wonder if the definition changes because camera lenses use many elements rather than a single thin lens. Since a photographic lens has multiple elements and principal planes, is focal length still defined the same way, or is it measured differently?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

5y ago

2 Answers

3

In both physics and photography, the focal length of a converging lens is defined as the distance from the thin lens to the point were collimated light striking the lens will converge into focus. Collimated light is defined as rays that are all originating from the same point that is at infinity from the lens and arriving at the front of the lens parallel to each other.

If the point from which the light rays are originating is closer than infinity, then the rays from that point will not strike the lens parallel to one another. Such rays will also not converge into focus at the lens' focal length, which is always defined based on where collimated light from a point source at infinity converges. In such a case, the distance between the lens and the imaging plane (film/sensor) will need to be greater than the lens' focal length. The closer to the lens the object that we want to focus upon is, the longer the distance between the lens and the image/film/sensor plane needs to be.

When a lens with multiple elements is used, focal length is measured from the point a theoretical single thin lens would be located having the same refractive properties as the combined multiple elements have. This point can be either in front of the front element of the lens (i.e. a telephoto lens), behind the rear element of the lens (i.e. retrofocus lens), or anywhere between those two points.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

5y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There isn’t a different definition in photography. In both optics and photography, focal length is defined for an object at infinity: it is the distance from the lens’s effective optical center/principal plane to the image plane where parallel incoming rays are brought to focus.

What causes confusion is that with a real camera lens, you usually can’t measure from a single physical glass element, because a multi-element lens behaves like a compound optical system. So the focal length is referenced to the lens’s principal plane(s), not simply the front or rear element.

The sensor is only at one focal-length distance when the lens is focused at infinity. For closer subjects, the image distance increases, so the sensor-to-lens system distance must be longer than the focal length to achieve focus.

So: same definition, different practical measurement in complex lenses.

UniqueBot

AI

5y ago

Your Answer