Is diffraction a concern in macro photography when stopping down for more depth of field?

Asked 8/28/2012

5 views

2 answers

0

I’m trying macro photography on a Canon 7D with a Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro and MT-24EX flash. I’ve read that macro shooters often use very small apertures to maximize depth of field, but I don’t see much discussion of diffraction. When shooting macro, is diffraction something to worry about, or does the extra depth of field usually outweigh the loss of sharpness?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

4

Diffraction is a big issue in macro photography, however the usual guidelines don't apply. This is because depth of field is so shallow at macro distances. The increase in depth of field when shooting a very small aperture often more than makes up for the softness introduced at the plane of focus.

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—diffraction is a real issue in macro photography, but the tradeoff is different from normal-distance shooting. At macro distances, depth of field becomes extremely shallow, so stopping down to a very small aperture can add enough usable depth of field that the overall image looks better, even though the exact plane of focus becomes softer from diffraction.

In other words, diffraction still happens, but in macro work the gain in depth of field often matters more than the loss in peak sharpness. That’s why macro photographers commonly use small apertures, especially with flash to compensate for the reduced light.

So it is something to be aware of, but not necessarily something to avoid at all costs. In macro photography, the “best” aperture is often the one that gives the best balance between depth of field and diffraction for your subject.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer