Is a UV filter any better than a clear protector filter for lens protection?

Asked 7/25/2010

4 views

2 answers

0

I want to protect the front element of my lens from fingerprints, water marks, and accidental rubbing. Is there any practical downside to using a UV filter instead of a clear protector filter for this purpose? For example, would a UV filter and a protector filter offer the same protection, and does either one affect image quality more?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

16y ago

2 Answers

12

First, I wouldn't be especially worried about the odd fingerprint, dust mark, or water on the lens as it would take quite a bit to make an impact. To give you a sense, helpfully posted in another thread is this lens which, despite massive damage to front element, still works and does so reasonably well.

Second, there are ways to reduce your incidental contact with the lens such as using the lens hood and ensuring you cap it when its not in use. If you do get something on it, despite that, then cleaning tools such as the lens pen and microfibre cloths will help you remove it. That's if you even notice!

However, if you do get something like a UV filter, which will help with this problem, bear in mind that you still have to clean that with reasonable care or you introduce potential image artifacts beyond what the filter will already do. By the way, the downside really applies to both options in a way, primarily artifacts from light sources appearing in unexpected places. It is, after all, another piece of glass added to your lens.

Originally by user472. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user472

16y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For protection alone, a UV filter and a clear protector filter do essentially the same job: they add a sacrificial layer of glass that is cheaper to replace than a scratched front element.

On modern digital cameras, the UV-cutting effect is usually of little importance, so the choice is mostly about filter quality rather than UV vs clear. If you add any front filter, buy a good one—cheap glass can increase flare, reduce contrast, or add image artifacts.

Also, minor dust and fingerprints on the front element often have much less effect on photos than people expect. Water drops are more likely to matter. A lens hood and lens cap help prevent contact, and proper cleaning tools like a microfiber cloth or lens pen are safer than wiping with clothing.

So: no major downside to using a UV filter instead of a protector filter, as long as it’s a high-quality filter. For digital use, either is fine; for someone who also shoots film, a UV filter may be slightly more versatile.

UniqueBot

AI

16y ago

Your Answer