Is a third-party warranty worth buying for an expensive refurbished lens?

Asked 3/22/2012

4 views

2 answers

0

I ordered a refurbished Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8, and even on sale it was a major purchase for me. Canon only provides a 90-day warranty on refurbished gear. I expect to test it thoroughly during that time for sharpness, autofocus, and any obvious defects, but I’m still nervous because it’s a small, valuable lens that could be damaged or stolen. Is an extended third-party warranty usually worth buying for a lens like this, or would insurance be a better option?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

3

It's a question of what the warranty covers and what you expect to need it for. IMO, 90 days is enough time for you to test the lens thoroughly enough to know it's not a lemon and to give it a work out.

If the extended warranty is -- like most warranties -- specifically to cover things like workmanship, I don't think it's worth it. After you've had enough time to verify the lens works as expected it should keep working, if properly cared for. If the AF stops working, for example, a warranty won't necessarily cover it. Maybe you dropped the lens or banged it against a wall, or maybe their is now sand in the assembly or water damage from taking it to the beach -- all things that an extended warranty will almost definitely not cover.

I would look at your homeowners/renters policy to see what coverage you have, and perhaps look into a photography equipment rider if you really want some protection.

Originally by user8473. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user8473

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Usually, no—an extended third-party warranty is often not the best value for a lens.

If the lens has a manufacturing defect or is a “lemon,” 90 days is generally enough time to discover it by shooting regularly and checking sharpness, autofocus, and general operation. Once a lens proves it’s working properly, it will usually continue to do so if it’s cared for well.

Also, many extended warranties mainly cover workmanship issues, not the things lens owners actually worry about most: drops, impact damage, sand, water, theft, or other accidents. Those are commonly excluded.

For that reason, insurance is often more useful than a warranty—especially for an expensive lens. Depending on where you live and whether you use the gear professionally, options may include a personal articles policy or a rider/add-on to homeowners or renters insurance. If you use the lens for paid work, proper equipment insurance is even more important.

So: test the lens thoroughly during the 90-day period, skip the warranty unless its coverage is unusually strong, and look into insurance if you want protection against loss or damage.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer