Is a SanDisk Extreme Pro worth it in a Nikon D3100 that doesn't support UHS-I?

Asked 7/19/2011

1 views

2 answers

0

I use a Nikon D3100, which does not appear to support UHS-I. I'm comparing two SDHC cards: the SanDisk Extreme Pro (rated 45MB/s, UHS-I) and the older SanDisk Extreme (rated 30MB/s, non-UHS-I). Since the camera can't use UHS-I speeds, is there any real performance benefit to buying the Extreme Pro, or is the cheaper Extreme the better choice? I'm mainly interested in in-camera performance such as burst shooting and general use in a non-UHS-I body.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

5

If you observed the Extreme Pro is in fact faster than the Extreme than that does answer your question (it answers the faster part, we already know the cheaper part).

If you have both cards you can always run a test, just set the camera to burst mode and hold the shutter button - this will tell you the maximum burst length for each card, or, if you don't care about that, use a stopwatch to see how much time it takes to do something you do care about.

After you run the test, assuming the Extreme Pro is faster, you can decide how much you are willing to pay for the speed increase - and if the extra cost of the more expensive card is worth it to you.

By the way: 3 related things I learned during my 15+ years as a software developer are: 1. for any reasonably complex system (like, everything) you can't guess performance by using specs - you have to test it, 2. at some point the difference between the "fast" and "faster" systems is so small it's unnoticeable - at that point you can decide the slower system is good enough and go spend your time/money elsewhere and 3. the point the system is fast enough can change radically depending on how you use the system.

Originally by user2481. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2481

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

In a non-UHS-I camera like the D3100, the Extreme Pro’s headline speed advantage will usually be limited by the camera itself. Based on the replies, card speed mainly matters for clearing the buffer during burst shooting, especially with RAW or RAW+JPEG. For normal shooting, a 30MB/s-class card is generally enough.

So the practical answer is: the cheaper SanDisk Extreme is likely the better value unless you specifically need every bit of burst performance you can get. The Extreme Pro may still be a little faster in some cases, but not enough to justify the extra cost for most users in a non-UHS-I body.

The best way to decide is to test your actual use case: shoot a burst in RAW or RAW+JPEG and compare how many frames you get before slowdown, or time how long the buffer takes to clear. If the difference is small, buy the cheaper card and put the savings toward other gear.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer