Is a Cokin Varicolor 173 just a circular polarizer used backwards?
Asked 12/20/2017
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m trying to understand what the Cokin Varicolor 173 actually is. I’ve noticed that one of my circular polarizers shows a blue-to-orange color shift when I look through it from the “wrong” side, while from the normal lens side it behaves like a standard CPL. Is the Varicolor 173 basically the same thing as a normal circular polarizer mounted backwards, or is it a different filter design? If the effect is similar, is the Varicolor effect stronger or otherwise distinct?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
7
Is the Cokin 173 filter just a backwards CPL?
No. The effect is similar to mounting your polarizer backwards, but much more pronounced on the Varicolor filter.
Here is what my Hoya HD CPL looks like at 0° and 90° polarization angles, when oriented for correct mounting (male threads towards camera):
- Note that this is NOT a variable-ND filter. In the right image, the filter blacks out the light because the light source itself is polarized (coming from an LCD, which uses polarization to control light output).

Hoya circular polarizer, normal orientation, at 0° (left) and 90° (right) polarization
When I turn the polarizer backwards, here's what it looks like, again at 0° and 90° polarization angles.
- Note that my iPhone's auto-white balance tried to adjust for the color shift in both images. The left, bluish-cast of the polarizer is actually more pronounced than shown. You can see the yellow-shifted LCD monitor outside of the CPL. The left image should actually have a cooler color-temperature. Similarly, the yellow-ish cast of the right image should be warmed up slightly (the monitor is slightly bluer than normal outside of the CPL view).

Hoya circular polarizer, reverse-mount orientation, at 0° (left) and 90° (right) polarization
I don't own the Cokin Varicolor, but I have Singh-Ray's Gold-N-Blue polarizer (same effect). Here's the Gold-N-Blue filter at 0° and 90°, oriented for correct mounting:

Singh-Ray Gold-N-Blue polarizer, normal orientation, at 0° (left) and 90° (right) polarization
Here's the Gold-N-Blue oriented for reverse-mounting:

Singh-Ray Gold-N-Blue polarizer, reverse-mount orientation, at 0° (left) and 90° (right) polarization
I couldn't tell a difference between the obverse- and reverse-mounted Singh-Ray Gold-N-Blue filter. But the degree of the effect between the the Gold-N-Blue and a reverse-mounted CPL is significant.
- Also note, that in real life, the effect of the Gold-N-Blue (and Varicolor, I presume) is not so pronounced to turn the world into Denver Broncos colors, or to make it look like a Michel Bay color-graded film. The blue and gold/orange is extremely saturated here because the color-separated light from the LCD is already polarized (by definition of being an LCD monitor).
Originally by user11924. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11924
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
No. A Varicolor 173 is not simply a regular circular polarizer mounted backwards, although the visual effect can look similar.
From the community comparison, a normal CPL used in reverse can produce a blue/orange shift, but the Varicolor effect is much stronger and more deliberate. A standard CPL is made to act as a normal polarizer on the camera; when reversed, the quarter-wave plate and polarizer interact differently with already-polarized light, which can create those color shifts.
So your observation is real, but it doesn’t mean the Varicolor is just a backwards CPL in disguise. It’s a specialty effect filter designed to exaggerate that behavior.
Also, this is not the same thing as a variable ND. The darkening seen with screens or LCDs happens because the source light is already polarized.
In short: reversing a CPL may give you a related look, but it won’t exactly duplicate a Cokin Varicolor 173, and the Varicolor’s effect is more pronounced.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What’s the difference between linear and circular polarizing filters in photography?
How does a variable ND filter work, and does it also act like a polarizer?
Should I use a slim circular polarizer on an 11-16mm wide-angle lens, and are Cokin ND filters worth it?
Why does a cheap circular polarizer seem sharp at wide angles but soft at longer focal lengths?
How aperture affects depth of field when using lens tilt