Is a 90mm macro on Pentax 645 suitable for beauty portraits, or is 150mm better?
Asked 6/27/2016
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m planning beauty/fashion portraits on a Pentax 645 system and am considering renting the Pentax D FA 645 90mm f/2.8 Macro (about 71mm equivalent) or the 150mm (about 112mm equivalent). My shots will range from waist-up and chest-up to tight face-only portraits, and I may also want detail shots of jewelry or a watch.
Does the fact that the 90mm is a macro lens change how suitable it is for tight portraits? Is 71mm equivalent too short for close headshots, and when would the 150mm be the better choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
8
The distance, camera to subject determines the perspective of the image. Consider, things close to the camera reproduce large, and things further away, reproduce small. If you work in too close, the nose reproduces too big and the ears too small. We are taking distortion. It is mainly distortion of the facial features that causes the subject to say, “I look treble – I don’t photograph well”. The remedy is to simplely step back. Most portraits are best if a moderate telephoto is used. A rule of thumb is to use a lens with a focal length of about 2 ½ times the diagonal of the format of the camera. For the full frame, that’s about 108mm. For the compact digital, that’s 75mm. It makes no difference if the lens is a zoom or fixed or micro, the key is to try and step back. This can be difficult as we naturally try to fill the frame and not leave empty space around the principle subject. Moderate telephoto to the rescue: such a lash-up forces us to step back and this action delivers a perspective that is a close match to what the subject perceives i.e. their view of themselves in the makeup mirror.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A macro lens does not change focal length behavior for portraits. A 90mm macro still behaves like a 90mm lens; “macro” mainly means it can focus much closer for high-magnification shots.
For portraits, perspective is controlled by camera-to-subject distance. If you get too close for a tight headshot, facial features can look exaggerated. Stepping back gives a more flattering look, and longer lenses are often preferred for beauty portraits.
So:
- 90mm on Pentax 645 (about 71mm equivalent) can work for waist-up and chest-up portraits, especially if space is limited.
- 150mm (about 112mm equivalent) is generally better for tight headshots and beauty work because it lets you stand farther back for a flatter, more flattering perspective.
- The 90mm macro has an advantage if you also want close detail shots of watches, jewelry, or other accessories.
If you want one lens to do both portraits and accessory close-ups, the 90mm macro is versatile. If your priority is the most flattering tight face shots, the 150mm is the stronger choice.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is the Pentax smc D FA 100mm f/2.8 WR Macro compatible with the Pentax K-r, and is it good for insect close-ups?
Will a 100mm macro lens be sharper than a 55-200mm with a Raynox DCR-250 for close-up macro?
Which Pentax K-mount macro lens is best for outdoor use: 90–105mm or 50mm?
Budget beauty dish for a Canon 580EX: ePhoto vs Cowboy Studio for learning off-camera flash
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM vs Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Macro for macro and portraits