Inkjet ('giclée') vs chromogenic photo printing: which is better?
Asked 9/18/2017
2 views
2 answers
0
What’s the practical difference between inkjet fine-art printing (often called “giclée”) and chromogenic photo printing on RA-4 papers such as Fuji/Kodak photo paper? I’ve heard chromogenic prints have smoother continuous tone, while inkjet prints may offer better color rendition and more paper choices. Is one process objectively better, or is it mainly a tradeoff depending on the look, medium, and archival goals?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
6
'Giclee' is just a fancy way of saying "that which erupts from an inkjet nozzle" and was coined by Jack Duganne so he could avoid calling his fine art prints 'computer generated' or 'inkjet' prints. With such printing a dye or pigment is sprayed upon a paper to create an image.
In chromogenic printing nothing is sprayed upon the paper. Rather, the paper has three light sensitive layers that are exposed to light projected through a negative or, in the digital age, projected onto the unexposed paper using RGB lasers or LEDs. The latent image on the exposed photosensitive paper is then chemically developed so that the dye couplers in each layer react to the exposed silver halide in each layer to form color dyes. Chromogenic printing is how the vast majority of color images produced in the film era were created.
Which process for making prints is better than the other is a matter of taste and how one wishes the print to appear. It is a little more complicated than the simplistic idea that inkjets gives finer control over subtle differences in color and photosensitive papers give smoother transitions that appear to have higher effective resolution. But the gist of what your printers are telling you is true - it's a matter of taste and deciding which tradeoff is more important to you for a particular image.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Neither process is universally “better” — they’re different technologies with different strengths.
“Giclée” is essentially a marketing term for inkjet printing. Inkjet printers spray dye or pigment onto paper. Chromogenic printing is a photographic chemical process: light exposes color paper, then the paper is chemically developed to form dyes in its layers.
In practice, print quality depends a lot on the printer, paper, and operator. Excellent results are possible from both. Chromogenic prints are often valued for their smooth continuous-tone photographic look. Inkjet fine-art printing is often preferred for wider media choice, strong color control, and ongoing improvements in pigments/dyes and archival performance.
So this is less a simple “dpi vs color” issue and more a matter of output style and purpose:
- chromogenic: classic photo-paper look
- inkjet/fine-art: broad paper options, strong color/archival development
If you want a traditional photographic print appearance, chromogenic may appeal more. If you want fine-art papers, more control over surface and media, and current archival-focused workflows, inkjet is often the better fit.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What advantages do giclée (inkjet pigment) prints have over traditional photographic prints?
What’s the difference between Lambda/RA-4 (C-print) and color inkjet printing?
Best double-sided inkjet paper for printing fine-art photo books at home
Can you use a protective varnish on Kodak Endura photographic prints instead of framing under glass?
Can an Epson SureColor P800 print on uncoated watercolor paper, and what settings should I use?