If full-frame and crop sensors use the same technology, is per-pixel image quality the same?
Asked 3/6/2014
3 views
2 answers
0
If a full-frame sensor and a crop sensor are made with essentially the same sensor technology and pixel density, would their image quality be the same on a per-pixel basis? I’m asking about the sensor itself: same generation/process, similar microlenses, and similar pixel size. In that case, is the main difference simply that the full-frame sensor captures a larger area, so it performs better only when comparing the same framing/output size rather than pixel-for-pixel?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
8
It's not particularly theoretical; full-frame cameras often offer a crop mode (Nikons default to DX crop mode when a DX lens is attached). Per pixel, the image is the same whether shot cropped or cropped to the same dimensions in post processing. That said, the image quality for the "same" picture (cropped versus full-frame at the same output size) is not the same, since the same per-pixel noise values represent 2.25 times more of the final image's total data. There may be every bit as much noise per pixel in a full-frame image, but the total error (difference from the "ideal" values in the image or in any object represented in the image, assuming the same composition/framing) will come closer to approximating zero simply because there are more of them.
(A decent-enough, though still inaccurate, rough analogy would be inkjet or process printing. Almost none of the actual individual values in an inkjet print is correct, but the higher the printer DPI for the same image pixel dimensions and PPI the more the resulting print looks like a continuous-tone image without altering the accuracy of any of the individual dots.)
With a smaller sensor (assuming the same desired output size), you either need to use the same number of smaller pixels, each with a greater individual error, or fewer pixels, the error from each of which is going to be more visible in the final image.
Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2719
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—if the two sensors have the same underlying technology and the same pixel density/pixel size, their per-pixel image quality should be very similar. A crop sensor is effectively like taking the center portion of a full-frame sensor with the same pixel pitch.
That means if you compare images pixel-for-pixel, noise and detail should be about the same. You can think of a full-frame camera’s crop mode as demonstrating this: the cropped portion records the same pixels the full sensor would have captured in that area.
Where full frame gains an advantage is in the final image when you compare the same composition and output size. Because the full-frame sensor captures a larger area, it gathers more total light and records more total image data. When you resize or view both images at the same final size, the full-frame image usually looks cleaner and can show better overall dynamic range/low-light performance—not because each individual pixel is inherently better, but because there are more of them covering the scene.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why does a subject look larger on a smaller sensor with the same lens?
Does a full-frame camera with a 1.4x teleconverter outperform an APS-C body without one?
What image-quality benefit does a 100MP medium-format sensor offer over a 60MP full-frame sensor with the same pixel pitch?
Does a lower-resolution sensor have better low-light performance if sensor size is the same?
Is image SNR determined per pixel or by total photons collected?