How were film negatives protected or duplicated before scanners were common?

Asked 4/15/2015

3 views

2 answers

0

Before inexpensive scanners and digital archiving, how did photographers handle backup or duplication of film negatives? For example, if a studio lost its archive in a fire, were the original negatives simply gone, or were duplicate negatives or other backups commonly made? I’ve seen slide duplicators for transparencies, but I’m especially curious about negative film.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

8

The originals were that. The originals.

Obviously you tried to keep the negatives in a safe manner because the nitrates and films were very flammable, could being eaten by fungus, decolor, or all kind of things.

Even in remastering on movies like Star Wars they went for the original negatives, which were in bad shape.

In feature films after the original negative you produced a positive then another negative as a master to produce film copies. Probably this 2 intermediate films were the best back up you could have.

Home users didn't usually back up negatives. Probably had 2 copies of the printed photos and that was it.

The original negatives had some special value, for example in investigations, historic value, etc. So people were more carefull back then.


Digital era

Prior to the "inexpensive scanners" were the "expensive scanners" so you could go to a shop to use a drum scanner and have your image scanned that way.

Originally by user37321. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user37321

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For most still photographers, the negative itself was the master archive. Before digital scanning became cheap and common, the usual approach was careful physical storage rather than routine backup.

If the originals were destroyed by fire, flood, fungus, or age, they were often simply lost. Many photographers kept prints, and sometimes extra print copies, but not duplicate negatives.

In professional motion-picture workflows, duplicate elements were more common: an original negative could be used to make an intermediate positive and then a duplicate negative for printing. That kind of duplication existed, but it was not typically how everyday still photographers archived their work.

So the short answer is: most people did not “back up” negatives in the modern digital sense. They stored them as safely as possible, because the original negatives had unique value and could not easily be replaced. Even very secure storage was never guaranteed to be safe.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer