How should I price and negotiate a commercial license when a TV company makes a very low offer for my photo?

Asked 11/20/2014

5 views

2 answers

0

A TV production company contacted me after seeing one of my photos on Flickr. They want to use it as a background image for interviews in a TV show, with worldwide use. Their first offer was $1; after I pushed back, they increased it to $50 and said they do not have much budget for photos.

I’m new to licensing. Am I right to hold firm if I think the photo is worth more? How should I evaluate a fair price and negotiate a suitable agreement for this kind of use?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

17

Absolutely disagree with TFuto, so wanted to chime in as well. The photo is not just your work, but more importantly your product. They are the buyer and you're the seller/supplier. You're standing in a world where everybody can make photos, so the supply of photos is incredible great and on top of that there is (nearly) no cost 'per copy sold'. Point in case, the competition is pretty harsh. So the question becomes, how unique is your photo? Do you believe they can find somebody else who would offer them a photo they can use for a lower price? If so, take the $50, otherwise you can always try to make a counter bid. (And my advice would be to take it, check photodune.net for typical rates at which photos go nowadays (it's a lot less than it used to be)).

Just, don't ever ever do anything like

If they immediately come with an unfair response, I increase the price e.g. 10% or more. I insist being paid and my product being properly priced.

A counter bid is a counter bid, you're part of an economy and discussing prices is a part of that. It's not about honor or self-worth, it's just business. That might sound harsh, but honestly, you're better of being fair and polite in business than having an inflated dose of self respect.

Btw, just an afterthought, putting up your sellable work on a site like the aforementioned photodune (or more expensive site if that fits your... alignment) might both spare you paperwork and get you a nice extra income if you're doing this as an amateur.

Originally by user27565. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user27565

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—you’re free to set your own price and refuse any offer that undervalues your work. Don’t argue emotionally about the photo’s “worth”; decide on terms you’re comfortable with and let them accept or decline.

That said, also assess the license realistically. If this is only a limited background use in one program and the image is not central to the production, $50 may be within the range of low-end stock-style licensing. The key questions are how unique the image is, how easily they could replace it, and exactly what rights they want.

A practical approach:

  • Define the license clearly: where, how long, and in what context they can use it.
  • Set your price based on that specific use, not on vague statements about value.
  • Consider non-cash value too, such as an on-screen or end-credit photo credit, if that matters to you.
  • If their budget doesn’t meet your minimum, politely decline.

In short: don’t license it for less than you’re willing to accept, but make sure your expectations match the market and the limited nature of the requested use.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer