How should I interpret DxOMark ‘perceptual megapixels’ for the Canon 100mm Macro on different Canon APS-C bodies?
Asked 11/21/2022
4 views
2 answers
0
I’m comparing used Canon APS-C bodies to use with the Canon 100mm Macro USM and noticed that DxOMark’s ‘perceptual megapixel’ score for this lens/body combination doesn’t rise consistently with sensor resolution. For example, some 18MP bodies score higher than some 24MP bodies.
Does this mean the lens actually performs worse on a 24MP body than on an 18MP body? Is there an ‘optimal’ sensor pixel count for this lens, or is DxOMark’s number being misunderstood?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
3y ago
2 Answers
1
DxOMark's "perceptual megapixel" rating is an attempt to distill a lens's MTF charts, which describe the lens's optical resolution of sagittal and tangential rays as a function of distance from the lens's optical center, into a single number or rating, when that lens is mounted on a particular camera body.
Distilling something as complex as a complex or 2-valued continuous function into a single number is problematic, and discards a lot of information that is useful for the discerning buyer.
Answering your question, there is no "optimal pixel count" of a camera body for a particular lens.
Originally by user11924. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11924
3y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
DxOMark’s ‘perceptual megapixels’ is a simplified summary of lens sharpness on a specific body, not a direct measure of the sensor’s megapixels and not a sign that the lens suddenly becomes worse on a higher-resolution camera.
It compresses complex lens behavior (MTF, center vs edge sharpness, sagittal/tangential performance) into one number. That makes it convenient, but also easy to over-interpret.
Why the numbers vary between bodies:
- different sensor designs
- presence/strength of the anti-aliasing (low-pass) filter
- how the camera resolves fine detail across the frame
- the fact that one summary number hides center/edge tradeoffs
So no, you shouldn’t assume a 24MP body is worse than an 18MP body just because the P-Mpix number is lower. And there is no single ‘optimal pixel count’ for that lens.
In general, a higher-resolution sensor does not make a lens less sharp; it may simply reveal the lens’s limits more clearly. For real comparison, look beyond one aggregate score and check detailed sharpness behavior across the frame, plus real-world sample images if possible.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI3y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can a Canon 80D and 100mm macro lens photograph a human eye in extreme detail?
Will a Canon 700D or 6D give better image quality with a 100mm f/2.8L Macro for jewelry photography?
How useful is DxOMark's Perceptual MPix when comparing lenses on APS-C?
Do Nikon DSLRs really have better sensors than Canon, and how useful are DxOMark scores?
Will the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro work on a Canon EOS 250D / Rebel SL3?