Do Nikon DSLRs really have better sensors than Canon, and how useful are DxOMark scores?
Asked 9/4/2014
8 views
2 answers
0
I’ve noticed that many Nikon DSLRs from roughly 2010 onward score higher than comparable Canon models on DxOMark, including overall, portrait, landscape, and low-light ISO. Does that mean Nikon sensors were genuinely better in that period, or are those scores misleading? I’m trying to understand whether this reflects real-world image quality differences or just the way DxOMark measures and weights sensor performance.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
36
The DxO Mark scores are misleading, but that doesn't mean the gap in performance isn't real!
Several Nikon bodies (D800, D600 many of the D3xxx and D5xxx series) are using Sony Exmor sensors which feature a cutting edge ADC/read noise reduction system to achieve massive gains in dynamic range compared to Canon sensors, which are designed and fabricated in house.
This is reflected in the DXO "landscape" score, but is better demonstrated by looking at the dynamic range graph:
As you can see the gap in dynamic range disappears after ISO800, this is where it moves from being read-noise limited (where the D810 is significantly better) to being photon-noise limited, where both cameras perform similarly as photon noise depends mainly on how many photons you capture, which is determined by sensor area.
The DxO low light score is massively skewed towards the Nikon camera as it considers colour accuracy as well as noise. Canon colour accuracy is slightly lower due to a design decision to optimise for sensitivity and performance under flourescent lights. The signal to noise ratio graphs tell a more accurate story:
The measured results are very close, which is exactly what you'd expect if noise is photon limited since two sensors of equal size will capture the same number of photons. Signal to noise ratio isn't the only concern and people will often qualitatively pick one over the other. But the fact remains low light noise performance is similar.
What is not similar nor open to interpretation is the gulf in shadow noise at low ISO. Canon are invested in sensor production so lack the ability to "shop around" for the best model, so it's unclear when they will be in a position to turn the situation around. Low ISO dynamic range is just one on many factors that make a good sensor (or camera) but if it is important to you then it may be worthwhile switching, as Canon have not moved on this front for quite a few years now, they are either unable to improve (due to manufacturing limitations or patent issues) or don't regard it as a priority (or both).
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
DxOMark scores shouldn’t be treated as a simple “brand A is better than brand B” verdict. Their overall score combines several measurements with its own weighting, and some of those favor specific use cases more than others.
That said, the performance gap seen in many Nikon DSLRs of that era was real in one important area: low-ISO dynamic range/read noise. Several Nikon models used Sony-designed sensors that delivered noticeably cleaner shadows and better dynamic range at base ISO than many Canon sensors of the same period.
But that advantage was not universal. As ISO rises, the gap becomes much smaller, and performance tends to converge. Also, sensor quality is only one part of a camera system. Handling, autofocus, lenses, flash system, features, and workflow matter just as much.
So the practical takeaway is: Nikon often had a real sensor advantage at low ISO in those years, but DxOMark’s single-number rankings can overstate how much that matters for all photographers. Choose based on your actual shooting needs and the whole system, not just one benchmark score.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How useful are DxOMark scores for comparing cameras?
Why can the same lens score much lower on a newer camera body in DxOMark tests?
Will a Nikon D3300/D3400/D5300 noticeably improve low-light concert shots over a Canon 550D/T2i?
How much has dynamic range improved since the Canon EOS 20D?
Why choose a Nikon D5/D4/D3 over a higher-resolution body like the D810?

