How should I choose a macro lens for photographing insects, and how much working distance do I really get?
Asked 6/17/2016
4 views
2 answers
0
I want to photograph small, easily startled insects and capture close detail like eyes and body parts. I’m comparing longer macro lenses such as a 150mm macro with a 105mm macro, and I’m confused by articles that quote different subject distances at high magnification.
How much working distance can I realistically expect with a 150mm-class macro lens, and why do some sources give different numbers? For insect photography, is a longer macro generally a better choice than a 105mm? Also, is it practical to add a teleconverter, extension tubes, or close-up attachments to a macro setup for more reach or magnification?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
1
I've used these setups on both DX and FX bodies
I used to shoot a Sigma 180mm Macro for insect and flower photography. It is an amazing lens but it was pretty much dedicated to tight closeups or long telephoto so in the end it is really jut wastes space in my camera bag.
Now I used my Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 with a 2x Teleconverter and a a set of extension tubes. for slightly more weight than the 180mm I get 70-200mm f/2.8, 140-400mm f/5.6. with the 400mm lens and a 36mm extension I can photograph bees at 1:1 from around 18 to 24 inches away. Example Album.
Originally by user590. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user590
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For insects, a longer macro lens is usually preferred because it gives more working distance at the same magnification, which helps avoid scaring the subject.
That’s why a 150mm or 180mm macro is often favored over a 90–105mm macro for insects. A 105mm can still work, but you’ll generally be closer to the subject. The different distance figures you’ve seen are likely using different reference points: some quote focus distance from the sensor plane, while others mean working distance from the front of the lens to the subject.
Based on the community experience here, a 150mm is a solid choice for insect work, and 180mm can be even better if your priority is extra distance. Optical quality is unlikely to be the deciding factor, since dedicated macro lenses are generally very sharp.
Accessories can help, but each has tradeoffs. Extension tubes increase magnification but reduce focusing range and convenience. Teleconverters can extend reach and may be useful in some setups. One answer reports good results using a 70–200mm with a 2x teleconverter plus extension tubes for bee photography at about 1:1 from roughly 18–24 inches. So yes, these add-ons can be practical, but for a simple dedicated insect setup, a longer macro lens is the straightforward solution.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What camera gear should I pack for photographing insects in a jungle?
Why does a 100mm macro still need to be close at 1:1, and how is it different from a 50mm macro?
Will a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro work on an EOS 450D for insect photography?
Which macro lens is a good choice for a full-frame Nikon: 105mm or a longer option?
How can I achieve extreme macro magnification on insects, and is focus stacking practical in the field?